Posted on 10/29/2008 3:55:10 PM PDT by wagglebee
MADRID, October 29, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Six professors of the University of Madrid have produced and signed a manifesto in defense of the dignity of human life and natural death, which they made public at a press conference held in Madrid on Monday.
The group, University Professors in Defense of Natural Death, began their manifesto with the statement, "Given the intense pressures on Spanish public opinion to approve assisted suicide and euthanasia, the need exists to defend the dignity of natural death as the proper end of every human life.”
The university professors' document may be seen as a response to a group of Spanish euthanasia advocates, led by Dr. Luis Montes, who issued a manifesto in July that claimed that "the human person ... enjoys the rights of self-determination, liberty, dignity, and others, which permit him to dispose of his life" and "to confront death in light of his personal decision."
The Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano commented in an article on October 15 that "Spain is in the forefront of the most contestable" bio-ethical policies, with the socialist government intending to reform Spanish abortion laws and legalize a form of euthanasia.
The socialist government of the Spanish province of Andalucia is considering new legislation which would allow terminally ill patients to refuse medical treatment and make it illegal to keep someone alive by what they have called "therapeutical excess."
The proposed law could fine doctors up to one million euros for "unjustified and useless measures for prolonging life," according to the Spanish newspaper El Pais.
The University of Madrid professors state that “human life is sacred, for its intrinsic dignity which cannot be measured in degrees, as it is universal, regardless of one's situation of age, health, or the autonomy he possesses” and that the state has an "undeniable duty" for the protection and care of every person "even when the person seems to have lost their value.”
The manifesto continues: “Euthanasia understood as a deliberate act of terminating the life of a person, whether it be upon personal request or upon the decision of a third party, and assisted suicide, are morally and ethically reproachable.”
The document ends with an appeal to Spanish citizens and the government to recognize the dignity of natural death "as it is a right of every person."
“A society that accepts the termination of the lives of certain people, due to their precarious health and because of the intervention of third-parties, inflicts on itself the belief that the lives of the sick are not worth living or are of lesser value,” the professors conclude.
Link to the Spanish text of the manifesto: http://www.defensamuertenatural.org/
See related LifeSiteNews.com articles:
Spanish Euthanasia Advocates Launch Legalization Campaign
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jul/08071808.html
Proposed Spanish Euthanasia Law Would Fine Doctors for "Unjustified Measures" to Prolong Lives of Patients
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08090412.html
The document ends with an appeal to Spanish citizens and the government to recognize the dignity of natural death "as it is a right of every person."
Perfectly stated!
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
This got me to thinking about why I have never had a pet that died a natural death. They were either killed by another animal, or got very sick, and I had them euthanized. What is it about natural death (and suffering) that scares me for my pets, but for humans, I don’t want to see us euthanized even if we are suffering?
Getting run over by a car is unnatural?
I don't mean to trivialize the subject, but I think the difference lies in the idea that we as humans have a capacity for, thus responsibility for, self-determination that animals lack.
At any rate, I'm guessing that an ethicist, or a pro-life one, would argue something like that.
You raise an interesting point. I wouldn't wish to see a pet of mine suffer if I could do something to mitigate or ameliorate the suffering. I couldn't consider the same thing for a human. Interesting double standard that we maintain.
(I like to think my McNuggets today died a natural death...)
Though we all love our pets and pets certainly have “personalities,” they do not have souls. God gave man dominion over all other living creatures, but NOT over other men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.