Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

San Francisco values on steroids
1 posted on 10/24/2008 1:38:20 PM PDT by outfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: outfield

Having some conservative officials in public office throughout the San Fran area power structure and in the state of California would do WONDERS for the economy as well.


2 posted on 10/24/2008 1:40:51 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

It could also bring a more moral class of citizen to San Francisco.


3 posted on 10/24/2008 1:42:29 PM PDT by jessduntno (Barack - Swahili for "High Wind, Big Thunder, No Rain")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

So SF can also legalize pedophilia, bigamy, bestiality, and drug peddling, and reap in massive revenues. [/s]


4 posted on 10/24/2008 1:43:11 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield
Sales Tax on services. Business Permits. Franchise Tax (like cable company fees).

Of course all passed to the final consumer.
5 posted on 10/24/2008 1:43:22 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield
Taxing hookers? Tourist sex dollars? How does this help the economy otherwise?

I WILL NOT spend a dollar in California.

GTH SF.

6 posted on 10/24/2008 1:44:15 PM PDT by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield
When decent people leave SF be sure not to turn around for a last look . You should remind your old lady , but she probably won't listen .
7 posted on 10/24/2008 1:44:35 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F/8 Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

The only way to boost aneconomy is to become more productive. I don’t think prostitutes constitute any technological leap. They will cut down on the time a lot of guys waste in the clubs, but pornography already serves that purpose well.


8 posted on 10/24/2008 1:44:37 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

>San Francisco values on steroids.

Don’t worry, if they defeat Proposition 8, it’ll be gay prostitution too!


9 posted on 10/24/2008 1:45:16 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

nothing like a good run on antibiotics to spur the economy.


11 posted on 10/24/2008 1:46:16 PM PDT by DannyTN (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

My big problem with legalized prostitution is the major health maintenance costs. The testing and medical help for sexually-transmitted diseases (STD’s) are going to be exorbitant, just as the legal brothel operators in Nevada have found out.


12 posted on 10/24/2008 1:47:08 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield
‘Why not legalize prostitution because then brothels will be taxed, prostitutes will be taxed and that will boost the economy,'" Hostin said.

Not to pick at nits here, but taxing something does not boost the economy. Taxing something only boosts government spending, at the cost of removing money and depressing the economy, whether the commodity taxed is prostitutes, cigarettes or baby blankets.

If San Francisco really wants to boost the economy, rather than boosting the government coffers, it should legalize prostitution and declare that it is tax-free. That way they can save on the enforcement costs and still not take the money out of the hands of the prostitutes who are going to turn around and spend it.

It is a trivial example, but it demonstrates how Liberals just do not understand the difference between government spending and the economy, and that what is good for the government is not necessarily good for us.

And, BTW, if San Francisco is spending $11,000,000 a year on enforcement of prostitution laws, they are not getting much value for their money. There are more prostitutes, operating out in the open, in San Francisco than just about anywhere in the US outside of certain counties in Nevada.

14 posted on 10/24/2008 1:51:09 PM PDT by gridlock (I root for the New York Yankees. I have had just about enough of "Losing With Class".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

[Legalized Prostitution Could Help San Fran Economy]

But - hey, I thought all those illegals HELPED the economy!
Jobs that ‘we’ wouldn’t do??

They have become a corrupt third world country out there.


15 posted on 10/24/2008 1:51:14 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

Surprise, Surprise Johns!

You’re going to have to take that prostitute even if “she” turns out to be a “he”, otherwise you will be charged with discrimination!

Good luck!


16 posted on 10/24/2008 1:51:45 PM PDT by Nonperson (Cut off Obama's nut! Prosecute Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

maybe they should try cutting taxes first if they were that desperate, ya think?


17 posted on 10/24/2008 1:52:59 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama: If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

“CNN: Legalized Prostitution Could Help San Fran Economy”

Just CNN staffers looking for a job that will help them get back their self respect.


25 posted on 10/24/2008 2:07:47 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

Not much a step to take from legalizing it in the socialist paradise to requiring those without to get work in the oldest profession.


27 posted on 10/24/2008 2:09:19 PM PDT by weegee (If we're gonna share wealth, those earning > $1 a month are going to have to share with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield
San Francisco values on steroids.

Not Steroids, Ecstasy(gay party-rave drug)
28 posted on 10/24/2008 2:11:59 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

So they turn a blind eye to the crime of prostitution but you watch how they deal with the crime of tax evasion. You betcha they’re willing to draw a line there and throw the book at someone!


31 posted on 10/24/2008 2:24:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Colin, descending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

Well it will cause the doctors to stay busy with STD patients, that is for sure!


32 posted on 10/24/2008 2:32:20 PM PDT by buffyt (DEWEY BEATS TRUMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outfield

Oh yes.

Legalize mafia hits, and we could tax that income.

Legalize kidnapping, and we could get a percentage of the ransom.

Legalize shoplifting and bank robberies, and we could get a piece of that pie, too.

Of course we all know how much money we’d make if drugs were legal and we got our percentage on all those sales.

Why, we’d be richer than Solomon.


33 posted on 10/24/2008 2:33:09 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson