Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFreeBird

Sounds like that problem could be solved by building a $40 billion pipeline to the lower 48. No way a project of that magnitude could be done with a political lightweight in charge.


9 posted on 10/23/2008 8:47:28 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: glorgau
Sounds like that problem could be solved by building a $40 billion pipeline to the lower 48. No way a project of that magnitude could be done with a political lightweight in charge.

True, and financed by private, corporate funds to boot. And forcing a rebate for the taxpayers of the energy producing state. That would be very difficult to pull off.

10 posted on 10/23/2008 8:54:43 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
Great point! A pipeline to the lower 48!

Hmm... didn't Biden vote against the Alaska pipeline?

Biden was a reliable "no" on [the Alaska Pipleline]. In July [1973], when the Senate passed the Gravel-Stevens amendment allowing immediate construction of the line and precluding further judicial review, Biden voted no. The amendment passed after Vice President Spiro Agnew broke a 49-49 tie.

In November, Biden voted against final passage of the bill. The vote was 80-5, Biden one of the five.


11 posted on 10/23/2008 9:19:10 AM PDT by ikeonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson