Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gieriscm

Call me ignorant, but I’m surprised that stripped receivers were not already considered a firearm.


4 posted on 10/22/2008 7:18:12 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: caver

They were. The point is that they’re being re-categorized from “long guns” (which is what they become when you build them, 18” long AR-15 “pistols” notwithstanding) to “other” where “other” doesn’t count as a long gun.

Thus preventing 20 year olds from buying them to do their own build vs. pre-made. 50 “common sense” steps down, another 50 “common sense” steps to go before we’re completely disarmed.


9 posted on 10/22/2008 7:24:00 AM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: caver
I’m surprised that stripped receivers were not already considered a firearm.

They are...hence the 4473.

25 posted on 10/22/2008 9:19:27 AM PDT by gundog (I'm a bitter gun owner, and I vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: caver
Call me ignorant, but I?m surprised that stripped receivers were not already considered a firearm.

OK, you're ignorant! Just kidding. They are and have always been considered "firearms". Their further classification has been in effect been changed from "not a handgun" to "not a rifle", meaning 18-20 year olds can no longer purchase them.

26 posted on 10/22/2008 9:23:56 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson