why the wsj? they seem, at least of late to be beating the crap out of obama on a daily basis. in fact they have had some of most spot on articles about obama, and his socialist economic plan. i would like to know because i figured i would subscribe to them. you know, cancel the left wing rags and reward the ones that do a good journalistic job. if i am missing some thing, would like to know before i give them any cash!
I have subscribed to the online version of the WSJ since its inception. Under the new ownership of Rupert Murdoch the WSJ has demonstrably turned more tabloid in style. The revamped online Journal - to me - is a cluttered mess. But in my personal opinion, I have seen the WSJ run a picture of Obama and generally favorable articles of him on a near daily basis for about the last eight months. In fact, I wrote to the publishers about this.
While the editorial board still has their wits about them and clearly call Obama for what he is, the entire rest of the paper, beginning with the lead off front page, is all pro Obama. So, for me, after years of subscription to the paper, and nearly a decade of the online version, it's over. As I stated, I refuse to provide money and support to the apparatus of the machine that seeks to kill us.