Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker
Much as I fear a surveillance state — I think this makes more sense than allowing “burner” phones; as you do in the U.S.

Americans criticize Canada for lax security (often with good cause) — yet, you persist in leaving a gaping hole in your security, by allowing unregistered “burners”.

Terrorists, or criminal organizations are able to get a (for most purposes) secure communications system for the price of a few disposable cell phones. In Canada, everyone has to provide identification, before their cell phone is activated. While this does open the door for state surveillance, it also closes a huge gap in the security “wall”.

If we didn't have cause to tighten security in so many other intrusive ways (shoe inspections at airports; passports, biometric ID, no-fly lists, etc.) then I would be 100% against registering cell phones. Considering that we do need most of those other security measures — why leave a gaping hole?

10 posted on 10/19/2008 12:41:47 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

What I hate most about all this is that we’re allowing al-Qaeda to change our way of life, which is what its goal was all along. We’re just getting a little taste of how bad it would be under its rule.

If I had any say in the matter, I wouldn’t limit our freedoms at all, but theirs (anyone who has an unacceptably high probability of being al-Qaeda; e.g., all arabs and muslims, for starters)


11 posted on 10/19/2008 1:02:07 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson