The prosecution couldn’t even prove its case against Mark Fowley - “insufficient evidence”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/20/us/20foley.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Hmmm... wonder why this is not all over the headlines?
We is the selective moral outrage from the Democrats now?
we = Where
The Democrats were NOT morally outraged at Mark Foley or the toe tapper. They used it as a wedge issue to supress voter turnout from the evangelical community who “clings” to religion (although in Foley’s case, they may have bought this Edwardsian “family man” schtick).
They wanted to TURN OFF those who would get “morally outraged”. The Democrats know that they cant’ win over all of the voters so in some cases they just want to turn them off to both parties.
It worked. The Rats won Congress through media collusion.