To: NormsRevenge
They just talked of the 'sweeteners' on Fox News. Incredible; is all I can say. . .and am totally disgusted. If they were serious; why all the 'sweeteners'? Why did they not fix the infamous 'mark to market'/suspend Sarbanes-Oxley. . .promote SOMETHING seriously designed to grow our economy and 'free markets'. It is a travesty to hear the garbage attached. And to know what is NOT on there; that should be. Do not want to hear how 'things' will be added later. Who will add them. . .Obama?
Fools; all of them!
14 posted on
10/01/2008 4:13:27 PM PDT by
cricket
(America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~)
To: cricket
Right, take advantage of a national crisis to sneak some extras in...this needs to be exploited. They say that some of it is added to get the votes needed, but it is unacceptable in a time of supposed crisis.
15 posted on
10/01/2008 4:15:17 PM PDT by
LegalEagle61
(If you are going to burn our flag, please make sure you are wearing it when you do!)
To: cricket
150 Billion worth of sweeteners or more it sounds like on this one ..
I have a sweet tooth.. but damn..
16 posted on
10/01/2008 4:16:31 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson