The issue is not whether something is dangerous “only when used unwisely”, that is not the criteria. The criteria is when it is used unwisely, what are the potential fallout of such an incident.
If the fallout is mainly localized to the person making the unwise action, then we allow it because the individual bears the risk. But if the fallout engulfs a significant portion of the public as collateral damage, then society has a right to step in.