.
Are these infantile ramblings what now pass for rational, intellectually-sound, emotionally mature behavior in the Western world?
If the rantings of my sister and brother are any indication, yes. Both well educated, married with kids. Both living in Washington state. I am no longer able to discuss politics with either of them as it so quickly gets ugly. Painfully sad for me.
Here is what this Canadian liberal idiot said about anyone that votes for McCain/ Palin..The thing that makes me happy is the fact all these old ugly cows are so ugly they have to lower themselves even further to lmake remarks like this..Just plain jeaious..
As per Ms. Mallick, Palin brings nothing to the McCain ticket other than the white trash vote, which McCain already had sewn up. She’s an Alaska hillbilly (A Canadian wrote this??!!??). She goes on to outline, in oh-so-clever verbiage the finer points that distinguish ‘white trash’ from ‘trailer trash’. Her conclusion is that Palin is ‘white trash’.
I got this from here..
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=2083
The campaign of tawdry insults directed at Palin is in the spirit of the schoolyard invective that has been flying as regards the vice-Presidential nominee, such as making fun of her religion, appearance, upbringing, hobbies and her children’s names. The latter is in itself is an extraordinarily bad idea. Not that I’d know much about it, being white trash and all, but Democrats are likely to lose a substantial portion of the black vote if they keep that up. Tabascus-Jamal and Uniqua aren’t going to take kindly to a party that disrespects people simply because they have unusual names.
I'm laughing too hard to comment. BTT.
Excellent article!
I’ve actually been to Palin’s house in Wasilla. It’s a beautiful home with a high ceiling and large windows looking out over an Alaskan lake with Alpine mountains on the horizon. There’s a floatplane in the lake. The lawn, in summer, is lush and green. In other words, anyone calling her “white trash” is stupid or deliberately trying to misinform people. Perhaps both.
Alas for some of the more conservative voters, we expected the CBC and it's taxpayer funded monolith to get a bit of a come uppance with the new Harper government. It is true that the "Cultural and Arts community" (choke) had some tax payer funding cancelled. Thick with CBC of course. Much of their "art" was Anti-Christian and derogatory of family values and sheer propaganda. Screams of "censorship" have followed. As if anyone stopped these worthies from passing the hat.
Sorry to say that the fierce occasionally virago like NOW had high salaries and great renumeration to sit all year around and disseminate feminasty propaganda. First we were told that half of the taxpayers money had been cancelled. Next we learn that the money was re-instated.
In a way conservatives have tried to play the nice guys. Ask poor Joe Clark about doing that. (nine months Prime Minister) temporarily defeated Trudeau. At least NPR in the States has to get monies in part from public subscription. Excuse this rant but...... Mallick is a bell wether. What indeed lurks behind CBC?. Harper and his boys and girls had better watch their back. Conservatives now leading in polls for a majority. It is indeed "not over til' it's over".
Excellent, excellent column.
Great article!
Thanks for posting this, and BTT!
Let the rants of the leftists be heard by all. It can’t help but help. I’d like our chances if every undecided voter could watch nothing but Olbermann, Matthews, Mad-whatever-her-name-is and Maher for a week.