Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Default Swaps May Be Next In Credit Crisis
NY Sun ^ | 09/22/08 | JULIE SATOW

Posted on 09/22/2008 3:07:35 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Default Swaps May Be Next In Credit Crisis

Ultimate Moral Hazard Looms in the Markets

By JULIE SATOW, Staff Reporter of the Sun | September 22, 2008

The biggest Wall Street story most Americans haven't yet heard of is the $62 trillion unregulated credit default swaps market.

Here is one scenario: A hedge fund buys insurance in case a company defaults on its bonds — a so-called credit default swap — when the hedge fund doesn't necessarily own the bonds. Then it immediately shorts the stock, driving down the company's share price, leading to a downgrade, and eventually triggering a default. It is the ultimate moral hazard, like taking out fire insurance for a home you don't own: There is an obvious motivation to set the house on fire and collect the insurance.

Meanwhile, that same hedge fund may also be issuing its own credit default swaps, where it promises to cover a company's bonds if it defaults, in exchange for the buyer of the swap paying out a premium. The premium is paid out in regular intervals, much like an insurance premium, and is a simple means for the hedge fund to generate additional income. This is especially true because the hedge fund does not have to put aside any capital to cover the swaps it is writing. Riskier still, no bond has to actually be delivered to settle the swap in case of a default.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defaultswap; economicpolicy; financialcrisis; govwatch; hedgefund; housingbubble; leverage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2008 3:07:35 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 09/22/2008 3:08:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If you can short a stock enough to drive it into default, you don’t need to be involved with its credit swaps to begin with.

You’d just profit from driving the company you’re short into default.

Gonna have to find another way to make the sky fall...


3 posted on 09/22/2008 3:15:39 AM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Now granted I just got up. I can barely see, let alone understand this.

I guess I just don't get it. What are they going to do with the dozen or so houses that are now in foreclosure?

4 posted on 09/22/2008 3:17:05 AM PDT by Battle Axe (Repent for the coming of the Lord is nigh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I am against regulation for the most part. But it is clear that banks, hedge funds and others will drag down the economy for their own personal short-term gains. We have to stop letting that happen.

Short-sales are a good example. Why Cox et al allowed for the removal of short-sale restrictions is beyond me given the potential for massive moral hazard problems.

The same goes for allowing banks to do whatever they want, even when regulated by MBA students. Throw in the government interfering with the free market and we destroyed our economy by promising everyone free goods. Too much debt, no ability to pay.

We need Teddy Roosevelt again! Even the Republicans can conspire to screw the economy and taxpayers leading to a systemic collapse.

Why aren’t we prosecuting Raines, Johnson, Morzillo and others that created this mess? And the banks CEOs, CFOs, etc? Democrat or Republican? Why do we keep electing “give away the story” Dems and Repubs?

Bread and circuses.


5 posted on 09/22/2008 3:22:20 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
You should all remember that this scenario is totally fictitious... like Sarah Palin's incest and book burning, it's the invention of a journalists mind. It's not possible for one hedge fund to drive the stock of a healthy company so low that it will go into default. If the company is in trouble, then it's not possible for one hedge fund to be the only one who knows it.

Don't we have enough real problems to worry about right now without listening to journalists who are making up more?

6 posted on 09/22/2008 3:34:13 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobbyT

The criticism of short-sales is that funds can conspire to drive a stock down in price (one of the reasons that we put short-sales restrictions on the books in the first place). E.g. Schumer can tell his friends to short IndyMac, then announce that IndyMac is in severe trouble. Buffett could do the same with Fannie and Freddie. It becomes a virtual freefall.

Credit default swaps. Another seemingly simple risk management tool that blew out of control and is part of our financial house of cards. Suppose that I own the bonds of Corporation X. I try to reduce my risk exposure in these bonds by entering into a credit default swap. A CDS is like an insurance policy when the counter party (the entity you entered into the swap with) pays you the difference between par value and the value of the bond in a credit event. So, you are supposed to be protected against the company defaulting on its debt.

What happens if the counterparty defaults on its swap obligations? Suddenly, you took on all these risks, THOUGHT you were hedged out and now you are fully exposed to risk .... and probably don’t have enough equity to cover the losses.

This happened to me on Wall Street when during a crisis when we had to unwind our swaps. Think of it like this. You have fire insurance, auto insurance, life insurance, health insurance and theft insurance. And the insurance company goes out of business. Even worse, because the insurance industry is so bad, you can’t new insurance. Even worse, your spouse and child are sick and you just lost your job.

That is sort of where we are today.


7 posted on 09/22/2008 3:36:54 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
I am against regulation for the most part. But it is clear that banks, hedge funds and others will drag down the economy for their own personal short-term gains. We have to stop letting that happen.

Part of the problem is regulation of the wrong kind - congressional rules that force financial institutions to make bad business decisions to further politicians' PC agenda.

As a tradeoff, congress weakened other controls so businesses wouldn't squawk.

Another problem is that our government let Fannie and Freddie become too large and also failed to apply anti-trust laws to other financial institutions. So we saw a constant parade of mergers, takeovers, buyouts until we are now told these businesses are too large to allow them to fail.

The solution to both problems is obvious but don't expect the government to actually do anything.
While this bailout is going on the same businesses wuill bo doing the same things that got us in this jam.
They will probably need another taxpayer bailout before we even pay this one off.

8 posted on 09/22/2008 3:40:18 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The Alaskan landscape is littered with the bodies of those who have crossed Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

$62T—I don’t like the sound of that. Given our Government’s perchant for wanting to guarantee everything lately, I wouldn’t put it past ‘em to take that on too.


9 posted on 09/22/2008 4:16:13 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; ex-Texan
Here are a couple of another pings, which are beyond incredible!

Fury at $2.5bn bonus for Lehman's New York staff

$521,000: The average pay of Goldman Sachs employees ­ and that includes secretaries

10 posted on 09/22/2008 4:16:43 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
It's not possible for one hedge fund to drive the stock of a healthy company so low that it will go into default.

You are right. This is so kooky. If the company was basicaly healthy, others would BUY, BUY, BUY and laugh at the morons shorting the stock, all the way to the bank.

11 posted on 09/22/2008 4:23:17 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
...You should all remember that this scenario is totally fictitious...

Patrick Byrne, the CEO of Overstock.com might disagree with you.

12 posted on 09/22/2008 4:36:33 AM PDT by FReepaholic (Palin's hot and she has a birth certificate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

There is one element that has not been discussed in this whole financial drama.

Millions of home-sellers made ENORMOUS profits during the housing boom - flipping $100k dwellings for $200K+? The capital gains tax on home sale profits were changed or eliminated (good thing) - driving selling into the stratosphere.

Where were those *profit proceeds* invested?????


13 posted on 09/22/2008 4:36:36 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Satire - a heartbeat away from the truth!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

That guy has at least one loose screw.


14 posted on 09/22/2008 5:02:07 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

.

How many are going to prison and for how long???

.

15 posted on 09/22/2008 5:07:33 AM PDT by polymuser (Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

IMO, we need a good depression. The prices for everything, other than eggs and green beans, so to speak, are inflated way beyond real worth.

If only such a depression could depress the cost of government. If it can’t do that, then never mind.


16 posted on 09/22/2008 5:20:59 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Part of the problem is regulation of the wrong kind - congressional rules that force financial institutions to make bad business decisions to further politicians' PC agenda.

IMHO this is the absolute root of the problem and starts with Carter and his Community Revitalization Act that essentially forced the mortgage to make bad loans to minorities. More changes to the CVA instituted by Clinton continued to exacerbate the situation and made it even easier for minorities to scream racism when they didn't get a loan because they had a 480 credit rating. Basic common sense economic 101 policy - You can't lend money to people who can't pay it back...period!

Again...IMHO...the government created a bad situation for the lending institutions and they had to find a way around it. Everyone knew from the very beginning that these policies where bad but Wall Street being Wall Street created a window of huge opportunity with CDS and the investment banks ran it in the ground.

So who's really to blame...the greedy banks that capitalized on BAD economic policy or the government for creating the bad economic policy in the first place and then turning a blind eye to what the banks had to do to comply?

17 posted on 09/22/2008 5:31:46 AM PDT by Devilinbaggypants (Audaces fortuna iuvat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Insurance companies generally do not sell insurance to anyone who does not possess an insurable interest in said asset, person, car, house, etc.
18 posted on 09/22/2008 5:38:50 AM PDT by Boiling Pots (Old and Busted: Barack 0bama, New Hotness: Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

How do CDS’s compare to conventional credit insurance from regulated, properly capitalized companies?

Isn’t the credit risk already priced into the interest rate on the underlying debt obligation?

What is the point of CDS’s in the marketplace when (a) risk is priced into the interest rate (b) conventional credit insurance is already available and (c) the debt can be sold at a discount?


19 posted on 09/22/2008 6:03:47 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

GM max’ed out it’s credit card last week. At the rate they are bleeding cash, I’m guessing they are next in line at the trough. And if they line up, Ford will bully it’s way into the line as well.


20 posted on 09/22/2008 6:05:42 AM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson