Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It starts out ok, until the usual snide comment gets inserted by one Evan Kornog.What a laugh.
1 posted on 09/16/2008 11:14:42 AM PDT by curth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: curth

Evan Korndog? Columbia? What would Evan Korndog have said if the Post endorsed Obama?? Let me guess.


2 posted on 09/16/2008 11:18:25 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

Big deal. I can tell you who the New York Times will endorse as soon as the Dems nominate their candidate. I bet the Times endorses the Democrat is each of the next few presidential elections.

No bets after that, they may be out of business.


3 posted on 09/16/2008 11:19:28 AM PDT by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

Big deal. I can tell you who the New York Times will endorse as soon as the Dems nominate their candidate. I bet the Times endorses the Democrat is each of the next few presidential elections.

No bets after that, they may be out of business.


4 posted on 09/16/2008 11:20:03 AM PDT by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

It doesn’t necessarily help the candidate????


6 posted on 09/16/2008 11:22:01 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth
The MSM has all but endorsed Obama for President. Why is it ganging up on the New York Post? Its not exactly like the media is a disinterested and objective bystander in this election.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 09/16/2008 11:22:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

Maybe Obama is such a bad candidate it’s easy to tell months out.

If Obama had undergone one tenth the scrutiny Palin had, he would be laughed out of the campaign.

They are criticizing Palin for having a tanning bed, for goodness sake. Obama got his political start from an unrepentant terrorist. Two months after he gets his position, the legislature funnels money to the hospital his wife works out. They then give her a huge raise.

The presss is not interested.


9 posted on 09/16/2008 11:27:30 AM PDT by I still care (A thousand screaming Germans, some fake columns and swooning girly-men does not a campaign make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth
Most editorial pages still adhere to the tradition of hearing out the candidates during the period after Labor Day

Oh yeah, I'm sure the New York Times and the Washington Post are seriously deliberating which candidate they should champion somewhere down the road...

10 posted on 09/16/2008 11:28:25 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

You’d hate to see anyone break with the non-partisan, fair-minded, objective example set by the New York Times.


11 posted on 09/16/2008 11:30:40 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Pontius Pilate voted "Present")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth
“The Post, like Fox News, has made a place for itself by deciding that the old rules of the objectivity game are out of date, and readers or viewers want a stronger point of view,” said Evan Kornog, publisher of the Columbia Journalism Review.

Oh for Godsakes!

How old is Korndog? A hundred and fifty?!?

The New York Times is steadfastly adhering to their tradition of objectivity in the same way that I'm sticking to my tradition of being a 18th century Japanese schoolgirl.

12 posted on 09/16/2008 11:31:17 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

What could Obama say during the debates that would make him remotely acceptable? “I am not a Socialist”?

Like anybody would believe him!


15 posted on 09/16/2008 11:42:30 AM PDT by gridlock (The Democrats have attacked Motherhood. Now if they attack Baseball and Apple Pie, we're all set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth
“The Post, like Fox News, has made a place for itself by deciding that the old rules of the objectivity game are out of date, and readers or viewers want a stronger point of view,” said Evan Kornog, publisher of the Columbia Journalism Review.

I suppose the New York Times, the Associated Press, Time, etc., are the picture of objectivity.

16 posted on 09/16/2008 12:33:29 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

I don’t think the Post has anything to worry about. By November many of its rivals will be out of business so who cares what they have to say?


17 posted on 09/16/2008 3:20:39 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson