Posted on 09/14/2008 11:58:50 AM PDT by WilliamReading
Some scattered thoughts on the ponderable above:
1. Thave been some particular resource allocation decisions made by the Obama campaign that I've been skeptical of from the get-go. The one that always stood out was Georgia, with the criticism stemming from Electoral Portfolio Theory 101. Namely: while it was possible to conceive of a world in which Georgia went blue, it probably wasn't going to turn blue before North Carolina, and it certainly wasn't going to turn blue before Virginia. Obama very probably will have won the election if he wins Virginia, and he'll certainly have won the election if he wins both Virginia and North Carolina. So the resources deployed to Georgia are arguably redundant; it was hard to think of Georgia as providing better than about Obama's 320th electoral vote, even under the best case scenario.
2. Arguably also, the Obama campaign was too eager to defend certain states, such as Maine and perhaps Washington.
3. There is also one state that the Obama campaign arguably missed from his group of 22, which is West Virginia. Our tipping point model has always liked West Virginia because it is so demographically unique. It is easier to conceive of Obama winning West Virginia while losing a state like Virginia (if, say, he gained traction by positioning himself as a populist) than to conceive of his winning North Carolina or Georgia while losing Virginia. And what if Obama had selected Hillary Clinton to be his running mate? The two states that I think would have come into play almost immediately were West Virgina and Arkansas, but Obama had no real field presence in either state.
4. If the intention was to draw resources out of the McCain campaign, Steve Schmidt certainly didn't take the bait, never really venturing into states like Indiana or Montana.
5. But clearly, the post-convention electoral map appears to have been affected heavily by the choice of Sarah Palin, which fired up the Republican base and returned traditionally red states back to the red column. If McCain had instead picked, say, Mitt Romney, who ran poorly in the South during the primaries, it is much easier to conceive of North Carolina becoming an interesting state. If he had picked an insider like Joe Lieberman or Rob Portman, it is much easier to conceive of Montana, which doesn't like Washington DC candidates, becoming fertile ground for Obama.
6. Indeed, perhaps one of the reasons that McCain picked Palin was precisely because the Republicans were having trouble in states like Montana and Indiana. So maybe Obama did not bluff McCain into opening a field office in Kalispell, MT, but he might have scared him into thinking that drawing the Republican base together with the VP was a necessity, even if Palin may eventually present problems for him in other areas.
7. One further point to consider is whether polling generally becomes more partisan as the election nears. That is, was it in some sense inevitable that North Dakota would turn more red? My guess, after peeking at a bit of 2004 data, is that there probably is some tendency for states to "partisanize" themselves as the election draws closer, but nowhere near the scale of movement that the Republicans seem to have gotten post-Palin.
8. Keep in mind that the resource allocation choices made by the Obama campaign aren't necessarily focused on the goal of getting him elected President. They may also be motivated by a desire to expand the party's reach in future election cycles, or to help Democrats in downballot races.
9. Finally, this entire discussion is premature to some extent, since we don't yet know to what if any extent Obama's ground game advantages will be worth something. Take a state like Indiana, where Obama has an enormous field presence and McCain has almost none. I doubt that there has ever been such an imbalance of resources in any one particular state in the modern era; game theory would dictate (I think) that allocations of resources between different states ought to be about equal between the two major parties. What if the disparity is worth 3 or even 5 points above and beyond what is reflected in the polls? Then Indiana could very well be a tipping point state, and Obama's decision to set up shop there would look like a stroke of genius.
Lastly, a quick note. I'll be on the road for the next couple of days and as such, posting schedules are going to be a bit erratic. We'll do the best we can and appreciate your patience.
Obama has wasted a lot of money in places like Georgia, and Montana. Millions of dollars advertising in Florida has given them little benefit.
It will be interesting to see what states they pull out of next. Panic time.
No, his 57 state strategy was a mistake...
Famous Last Words:
Keep in mind that the resource allocation choices made by the Obama campaign aren’t necessarily focused on the goal of getting him elected President. They may also be motivated by a desire to expand the party’s reach in future election cycles, or to help Democrats in downballot races.
Obama would’ve lost Georgia even with Sam Nunn on the ticket.
No, it wasn’t a mistake. It was the best thing he could have done for this country.
He’s not going to get one vote in Euopean Georgia, tho’.....wonder if that was one of his 57 states.....
Actually the idea of the candidate appearing in ALL states appeals to me. It’s the idea that they can ignore half of the nation when campaigning that offends me.
Obama has made a lot of mistakes...
No, his 57 state strategy was a mistake...
You beat me to it. The first thing I thought of when I read the headline.
Absolutely not. I encourage Obama to spend lots of time and money campaigning in Alaska and Alabama.
0Bama is not ready to be president. He needs to go put in a little more time in the Senate to build some experience. Being the junior Senator from Illinois doesn’t help him much.
Seriesly, This guy makes my lege tingle. ;o)
The statement about Indiana seems correct.....I’m worried about Indiana ( NEVER thought I’d say that )....but if the current trends toward McCain continue, the next couple of weeks will tell whether the worry is appropriate.
That Obama could win either West Virginia or Indiana is way past crack pipe hallucinations. It is ingesting some kind of sci-fi 24th century drug.
It is also hillarious that Palin is hurting McCain outside the Republican base.
It has unified the base,attracted a few feminist Hillarycrats,appealed to independent white working class folks, and caused the Left to overreach. Giving Palin teflon coating.
If they had made reasonable criticism they may have hurt Palin.But the attacks were so outrageous that people dismiss any new attacks and will dismiss any damaging revelations from “Troopergate.”
That Obama could win either West Virginia or Indiana is way past crack pipe hallucinations. It is ingesting some kind of sci-fi 24th century drug.
It is also hillarious that Palin is hurting McCain outside the Republican base.
It has unified the base,attracted a few feminist Hillarycrats,appealed to independent white working class folks, and caused the Left to overreach. Giving Palin teflon coating.
If they had made reasonable criticism they may have hurt Palin.But the attacks were so outrageous that people dismiss any new attacks and will dismiss any damaging revelations from “Troopergate.”
With the new laws in New Jersey and Maryland which commit their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote national wide, for all practical purposes their votes are now McCain votes. The polling in those states is meaningless.
The MSM who cried wolf...or moose, in this case.
I read another article which said that the Obama team was regretting not taking matching funds. Since the convention his fund raising is way below projections and he may end up with less money than Mccain
The analysis from that site...well, post it next to the Limburger cheese. It won't smell so badly by comparison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.