Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer: Nebraska may have to adjust to preferences ban
JournalStar.com ^ | 9-5-2008 | Anna Jo Bratton

Posted on 09/06/2008 6:32:56 AM PDT by stan_sipple

The former dean of the University of Washington School of Law said Friday that Nebraska universities must be ready to adjust if voters approve a measure to ban most types of affirmative action in the state.

W.H. “Joe” Knight Jr.’s message to the Nebraska Legal Diversity Summit in Omaha: “Prepare yourselves.”

In 1998, voters in Washington approved a similar measure. Knight said minority enrollment decreased immediately, and has just now started to catch up because of the university’s hard work — and more money spent — on recruitment. Schools have also sought more scholarships from private donors, who can designate their money for minorities.

But a large problem with the measure, Knight said, was the perception it created among prospective students.

“You get a reputation,” Knight said in an interview with the Associated Press. Passing a ballot initiative to do away with affirmative action “suggests you’re not a welcome place.”

Knight spoke a day after University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Harvey Perlman said the institution would push for diversity regardless of the outcome of the Nov. 4 vote on the ballot measure.

The initiative would prohibit state and local governments from giving preferential treatment to people on the basis of race, sex, ethnicity or national origin.

It’s being bankrolled by California’s American Civil Rights Institute, led by California businessman Ward Connerly. Connerly has prevailed with similar measures in California, Michigan and Washington in past elections.

This year, a measure in Arizona didn’t make the ballot, and signatures are still being counted on Connerly’s initiative in Colorado.

Knight said recruitment got costlier in Washington, and it would likely skyrocket in Nebraska because of the Midwest state’s low minority population and the need to recruit out-of-state.

Supporters of Nebraska’s measure said that if the ban forced university officials to work harder to recruit people who face barriers to college admission, it’s a good outcome.

“They’re taking the easy way out” now, said Doug Tietz, executive director of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, which is pushing the measure. “You can do the skin color check or the gender check and that’s the easy way out.”

A better way to recruit people who face barriers, Tietz said, is to seek them out based on socio-economic status.

But that doesn’t mean a university couldn’t recruit at a church with mostly black members, he said. They just couldn’t give preference to those people when choosing who to admit.

Knight urged those at the conference to work in the next 60 days to keep the measure from passing.

But he said it’s difficult to defeat once it’s on the ballot, because “the language is innocuous” and most people don’t know what they’re voting on.

“On its face, what could be wrong with the principle of neutrality?” Knight said.

But, he added, “it’s a red herring.”

It’s not about taking two equally qualified candidates and choosing the black one, he said. It’s about realizing that “most of what we call qualifications are subjective, qualified preferences.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; affirmativeadvantage; civilrights; initiative; racialpreferences
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2008 6:32:56 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

I have read that the success rate in college for affirmative action students is low, and it has been argued that putting students into an academic environment they’re not prepared to deal with just sets them up for failure. I have also read that pointing out such facts is very dangerous and can be fatal to a career in academia. I’m just sayin’, that’s what I’ve read.


2 posted on 09/06/2008 6:40:23 AM PDT by Spok (The Sinopian Sage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

These preferences should be banned everywhere. They made sense forty years ago, and they made sense for a generation or so. But we are now well into the second generation to receive preferences, and will soon be into the third generation.

So, are there really people who believe the children of those who received preferences should receive them, and then the grandchildren should also receive preferences?

Time to treat everyone the same on college admissions.


3 posted on 09/06/2008 6:40:48 AM PDT by Will88 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

They will find a way to fulfill their mission of taking money from successful people who work to earn their money, and give it to people who vote democrat.


4 posted on 09/06/2008 6:42:54 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

“Knight spoke a day after University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Harvey Perlman said the institution would push for diversity regardless of the outcome of the Nov. 4 vote on the ballot measure.”

Perlman sounds like yet another Trotyskite university Prez who has no use for democracy.


5 posted on 09/06/2008 6:44:33 AM PDT by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
It’s about realizing that “most of what we call qualifications are subjective, qualified preferences.”

like what, good grades?!?
6 posted on 09/06/2008 6:49:07 AM PDT by steel_resolve (We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

“and more money spent — on recruitment”

....I wouldn’t give money to a college that spends money on recruitment....which I suppose means that I won’t be donating at all.


7 posted on 09/06/2008 6:56:14 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
Supporters of Nebraska’s measure said that if the ban forced university officials to work harder to recruit people who face barriers to college admission, it’s a good outcome.

"Barriers to college admission" meaning, of course, low IQ and aptitude.

8 posted on 09/06/2008 6:59:08 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

My own experience was students were admitted who didn’t belong there. Alot of them skipped classes when everyone else was working their tails off.

By three semesters, half the minority students were gone. Far higher percentage than everyone else. You could just see the lack of effort and it didn’t surprise anyone that very few graduated and passed the bar exam, especially the first time around.


9 posted on 09/06/2008 7:12:50 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
It’s about realizing that “most of what we call qualifications are subjective, qualified preferences.”

I see...sounds kind of like the Obama campaign.

10 posted on 09/06/2008 7:15:48 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Considering the supposed fact that Whites will be a minority in the USA by 2050, and already are in some portions of the country, i.e. Southern California, this couldn’t come soon enough. Everything tells me that affirmative action is wrong however the libs in academia will do everything in their power to thwart the will of the people.


11 posted on 09/06/2008 7:41:56 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
But he said it’s difficult to defeat once it’s on the ballot, because “the language is innocuous” and most people don’t know what they’re voting on.

BULLHOCKEY!!! They know exactly what they're voting on.

12 posted on 09/06/2008 7:44:57 AM PDT by dfwgator (After Saturday, the Miami Hurricanes will be downgraded to a tropical depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Preferences made sense forty years ago, and they made sense for a generation or so?

No, Will, racial preference didn't make sense, forty years ago, or "for a generation or so" or ever. Well-intentioned, guilt-ridden government/academic types picking and choosing which color of skin or which ancestry group gets free stuff never made sense, and never will, Will. Never.
13 posted on 09/06/2008 7:56:30 AM PDT by flowerplough ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

A man once noted that his grandfather was denied admission to Harvard because he was a Jewish man. Then came civil rights and affirmative action. Now he has been denied admission to Harvard because he is a Jewish man.


14 posted on 09/06/2008 7:57:45 AM PDT by Spok (The Sinopian Sage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I have read that the success rate in college for affirmative action students is low, and it has been argued that putting students into an academic environment they’re not prepared to deal with just sets them up for failure. I have also read that pointing out such facts is very dangerous and can be fatal to a career in academia. I’m just sayin’, that’s what I’ve read.”

I have heard exactly the same.

Not only are the “affirmative action” students ill-prepared for the whole college environment, they are taking a seat from a student who will be prepared and be much more successful with the education.


15 posted on 09/06/2008 8:00:20 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

“No, Will, racial preference didn’t make sense, forty years ago,..”

Yes, flowerplough, preferences made sense forty years ago when the country was initially beginning to undo laws and customs that had intentionally prohibited black citizens from many educational opportunities, and when so few of them had the financial ability to attend more prestigious schools.

There had been decades of preferences for whites over blacks. Twenty or thirty years to of the opposite was justified, but it is no longer justified because the problems holding blacks back now are internal to the black community and family, and second and third generation affirmative action makes no sense.


16 posted on 09/06/2008 8:05:59 AM PDT by Will88 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: stan_sipple
Knight said recruitment got costlier in Washington, and it would likely skyrocket in Nebraska because of the Midwest state’s low minority population and the need to recruit out-of-state.

They just don't get it. The people don't want diversity for it's own sake. The student body of the University of Nebraska should, more or less, reflect the diversity, or lack thereof, of the people of the state.

Besides, the state is diverse. They've got micks, bohunks, krauts,and lots of squareheads and other scandahooligans. That's just from the rural and small town areas.

19 posted on 09/06/2008 8:44:53 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comparative Advantage
Perlman sounds like yet another Trotyskite university Prez who has no use for democracy

You hit it right on the head.He's been there forever too. Physics professor originally. Involved in the anti-war activities in the late '60s and early '70s. He was also a neighbor of my wife's family back in the '60s.

20 posted on 09/06/2008 8:47:19 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson