Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now, the Bad News on Teenage Marriage
New York Times ^ | August 4, 2008 | Sarah Kershaw

Posted on 09/04/2008 8:23:56 AM PDT by reaganaut1

[I]t is teenage marriage today, not teenage pregnancy, that is the rarity. And, statistics show, teenage marriages tend not to endure.

...

The median marrying age for women in the late 1950s was about 19, according to David Popenoe, co-director of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University and an emeritus professor of sociology there. But a marriage between 19-year-olds — or even 17- or 18-year-olds — then would not have been described as a “teenage marriage,” he said. It was too routine to be given a special label.

There is no way to know how many of those unions were prompted by a pregnancy — a phenomenon that has decreased sharply in the population in recent decades as the marriage rate itself has declined, sociologists say.

Studies show that today teenage marriages are two to three times more likely to end in divorce than are marriages between people 25 years of age and older. The most comprehensive study on marriage and age that sociologists cite was published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2001, from 1995 data, and it found that 48 percent of those who marry before 18 are likely to divorce within 10 years, compared with 24 percent of those who marry after age 25.

“Most young women don’t fare very well when it comes to raising a family as a teenager, and those precious few who get married, the marriages are very short-lived,” said Bill Albert, chief program officer for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. “I know and respect a lot of 17-year-olds, but I don’t think any of them are ready to be married and begin the lifelong task of raising a child.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: marriage; palinattacks; palinfamily; teenpregnancy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_at_first_marriage the average age of first marriage has risen to 27.5 for men and 25.9 for women. In Europe it's about 30 for both sexes, which partly explains why whites are being replaced by Muslims, who marry younger.

In a discussion at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2072436/posts about discouraging out-of-wedlock birth *and* abortion, several Freepers suggested that people ought to be getting married younger. But it seems that marriages of the young (late teens, early 20s) are less stable than they used to be. I think it would be good if relatively early and lasting marriages once again became the norm, but the question is how to bring that about.

Delayed marriage is not a problem for the government to "solve", although it could play a role by ensuring that a high school diploma meant something and enabled most people to get on with their lives without spending another 4-6 years or more in school.

1 posted on 09/04/2008 8:23:57 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Same Sex marriages don’t last either...


2 posted on 09/04/2008 8:25:08 AM PDT by weegee ("We now know far more about Sarah Palin in just 4days than we've learned about B.Obama in 17 months")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Dems/MSM trying to make Bristol’s pregnancy and impending marriage a campaign issue. It isn’t.


3 posted on 09/04/2008 8:26:43 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
a phenomenon that has decreased sharply in the population in recent decades as the marriage rate itself has declined, sociologists say.

Admitting, but not directly, that the result of the availability of abortion and consequence-free sexual activity among unmarried people has led to fewer marriages and families.

Communist Goal for America
#40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

4 posted on 09/04/2008 8:27:45 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
But it seems that marriages of the young (late teens, early 20s) are less stable than they used to be. I think it would be good if relatively early and lasting marriages once again became the norm, but the question is how to bring that about.

By making divorce taboo again. By making it more important to put family first over the whims of the feelings of an individual. Today an individual's feeling is more important that havok a divorce causes to the children and spouse. That is the downfall of our families.

5 posted on 09/04/2008 8:30:05 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Let’s talk about this after someone gets the stats for teenage marriages in Alaska. They are different up there. Thank God for that!

Oh, and I guess my marriage wasn’t supposed to last, either. Wow, someone should have told us that 33 years ago!

The secret to a long marriage? Marry for love, marry for life. Simple.


6 posted on 09/04/2008 8:31:56 AM PDT by blu (Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“C’est la vie”, say the old folks, just goes to show you never can tell.


7 posted on 09/04/2008 8:32:02 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wikipedia? Are you going to quote the daily Kos as well?


8 posted on 09/04/2008 8:33:58 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I find that in my “small town” community, many marriages came from high school relationships and they’re still going strong, many of them 40+ years later. The NYTimes just doesn’t have a clue about our small communities.


9 posted on 09/04/2008 8:34:04 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good points. Also, there are many plusses in having children while young, simply from a physical point of view. Many of our “young” people who get married at 30 nowadays are having trouble conceiving, simply because the body has already passed its child-bearing peak.

But aside from that, as far as high school goes, I think that whole system has got to be dumped anyway. Kids should emerge from formal education by age 16 with all they need to go into a trade or apprenticeship program, go into college if that’s what their career path requires, or get a decent job. The extended childhood is what has undermined marriage as well as education and employment for young people.


10 posted on 09/04/2008 8:35:11 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

That guy STILL puts on a great concert.


11 posted on 09/04/2008 8:35:17 AM PDT by WayneS (Vote Obama bin Biden 2008 - "Because the world doesn't suck enough yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Wikipedia? Are you going to quote the daily Kos as well?

The Wikipedia source is the United States Census Bureau.

12 posted on 09/04/2008 8:40:38 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My wife and I married when I was 21 and she was 19. Actually it was three days after her 19th birthday. (We put it off for six months because her parents were uncomfortable with her marrying at 18.)

We are still married, have three kids, the youngest turns 18 next month.

Wouldn’t have missed it for the world.


13 posted on 09/04/2008 8:41:18 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Wikipedia? Are you going to quote the daily Kos as well?

Wikipedia has become a fairly reliable source.

14 posted on 09/04/2008 8:42:35 AM PDT by E=MC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

“NYT doesnt have a clue”

The happiest couple I know have been together since age 14. Today, they are in their 70’s and still very much in love. The difference is values. I took my vows before God, for better or worse.


15 posted on 09/04/2008 8:44:10 AM PDT by mouse1 (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The left say we are doomed by global warming in the next 20 or so years... Maybe being married at a young age is not such a bad idea.... Live while you can....
16 posted on 09/04/2008 8:44:26 AM PDT by just me (Liberals do not like children, and children are one of the reasons I like Sarah Palin.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I married at 17 right out of High school. I had 7 children and retuned to school to get a degree.

We will celebrate or 48th wedding anniversary in Feb .

In todays culture we just would have moved in together to try it out..


17 posted on 09/04/2008 8:47:21 AM PDT by RnMomof7 ("Sola Scriptura,Sola Christus,Sola Gratia,Sola Fide,Soli Deo Gloria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC2

No it has not.

It is partisan controlled and has proved vulnerable for use in scams to manipulate niche markets short term. People who don’t want to take time to do credible research wish it was reliable, and make Jason Blair bravado assertions about it’s non existent fact checking.

Have the admitted their partisan re-edit in the George Allen scandal, and made amends yet?

When that happens you may feel free to hawk your claims about Wiki’s reliability. Until then that egg on your face might be better with pepper.


18 posted on 09/04/2008 8:49:13 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard; reaganaut1

Sadly, not all the old folks wish them well.


19 posted on 09/04/2008 8:53:02 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Studies show that today teenage marriages are two to three times more likely to end in divorce than are marriages between people 25 years of age and older.

There aren't many teens in divorce court. Notice the today qualifier, as in it's not true for people married 20 years.

Why leftists might be interested in early marriage: most swingers got married young and tolerate the cheating. Most people that get married older would not tolerate that for a second.

20 posted on 09/04/2008 8:53:56 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson