Right is right and wrong is wrong. These "scientists" are just trying to justify adultery.
Can we name it the Bobbit gene?
Okey, dokey. So, now BJ’s excuse will be, “It wasn’t my fault I had sex with that woman.”
I got one! Proud of it.
Do I get a button?
Just wondering, is it far from the credit card gene women have?
Crap science.
Gonna find the “whore” gene and the “gold-digger” gene next?
I wonder why the title talks about People and the first line only mentions men and in a derogatory manner. Maybe feminists should demand some equality here.
Never has paid and I'm running out of time, money and earning capacity necessary to support it.
RS3 334’s social effects extend beyond bonding in couples. Earlier this year, the same gene section was shown to affect signalling in people’s amygdalas, linked to trust. Another study found that people with autism, which is characterised by unusual social behaviour, often have multiple copies of RS3 334
My ex-wife sure as heck didn’t have the monogamy gene.
I’m a multiple gene man...I’m an autistic , trusting,
commitphobe......
Just attended a lecture discussing the ability of genetic
analysis to predict illness...it really doesn’t work yet,
our bio. system is way too complicated for simple correlations
like the article seems to imply.
Never mind predicting human behaviour.
Maybe there’s a gene for “people who see or seek explanations in
material systems” Or a gene for people who don’t believe
all they hear, or those who do....
Or a gene for those who spend lots of time on Free Republic....
You don’t want the zerogamy gene.