Skip to comments.
A Conversation with Philip J. Berg, Esq. (Obama birth certificate lawsuit)
americasright.com ^
| 8-23-08
| Jeff Schreiber
Posted on 08/23/2008 11:11:37 PM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: doug from upland
21
posted on
08/24/2008 12:17:43 AM PDT
by
gunnyg
To: doug from upland
I think the major damage that can be done to Obama is from proving that he was fraudulently displaying forged documents on his website.
That could make a lot of support for him disappear overnight.
22
posted on
08/24/2008 12:20:33 AM PDT
by
Wil H
To: billmor
If we had an honest MSM, they would have investigated this long ago and either Obama would have met the requirements or he would not and he would not be set to be nominated this coming week.
23
posted on
08/24/2008 12:28:07 AM PDT
by
JLS
To: doug from upland
He believes that the United States government was behind the attacks of September 11, 2001
And anyone would believe anything that comes out of this guys mouth ?
24
posted on
08/24/2008 12:29:19 AM PDT
by
sonic109
To: matthew fuller
25
posted on
08/24/2008 12:36:20 AM PDT
by
razorbak
To: razorbak
MESSAGE FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: "Look at me, Obama! It's all for you!!!"
26
posted on
08/24/2008 12:43:42 AM PDT
by
razorbak
To: doug from upland
Last night I heard Berg interviewed by Ian Punnet on his radio show. He blandly cited the following BC in support of his case:
Berg is a nutcase, pure and simple. He's the lowest form of crackpot, a 911 truther. He's a total waste of time.
27
posted on
08/24/2008 12:45:08 AM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: cynwoody
28
posted on
08/24/2008 1:05:28 AM PDT
by
razorbak
To: sonic109
Which “party” of the US Government was involved in the attacks? That’s what I’d want to get on tape. The whole 9-11 conspiracy has interesting resonance. Do I believe it per writ? No Way.<pBut the Democrats DID enact laws and policies which made it possible for 9-11 to happen. Republicans didn’t do this.
29
posted on
08/24/2008 3:57:19 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: doug from upland
LOL. Hillary better work on her Photoshop skills.
30
posted on
08/24/2008 4:30:13 AM PDT
by
panaxanax
(Writing in John Bolton/Duncan Hunter in 2008!)
To: doug from upland
31
posted on
08/24/2008 6:31:17 AM PDT
by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: outofsalt
To: doug from upland
Look, the truth comes down to this -- at this point in time, its time to fish or cut bait, time to stop pussy-footing around. At this point in time, Obama owes it to people to produce the documents....
If the media wants to confront me, Ill confront them. Ill ask them why I need to do this, why they didnt do this months ago....
I think that, in this type of case, the burden of proof shifts. I think that Sen. Obama owes it to his party and to the citizens of this country to show that I am wrong. If I am, if he produces the documentation, the case will go away, Ill go away, and he can go forth and do what he can in the election. But if he ignores this topic, I believe it shows guilt on his part....
He should threaten me. Berg, he should say, here are the documents and, if you do not withdraw the suit, I will sue you. Right now, he has no basis to sue me. If he does have the documents, he should show them, and Ill walk away. Ill withdraw the case. Kudos to this guy!!!!!
33
posted on
08/24/2008 5:32:07 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
(Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
To: cynwoody
Last night I heard Berg interviewed by Ian Punnet on his radio show. He blandly cited the following BC in support of his case: Actually, Berg's lawsuit takes the shotgun approach that "on the internet, some say he was born in Kenya, some say he was born at two different hospitals in Hawaii, some say the Hawaii COLB is a forgery, some say he was born in Canada, some say he was and may still be an Indonesian citizen, etc., etc., etc." He wants the court to sort it all out and pass judgment on whether Obama is eligible to run or not.
Therefore the "Ontario birth certificate" is relevant.
34
posted on
08/24/2008 5:43:49 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
(Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
To: Dajjal; cynwoody
The "Ontario birth certificate" is an acknowledged joke, proffered by the writers as a tongue-in-check placeholder until the real one surfaces.
Note, in particular, the signature ("Dudley Dooright" [sic]) and the number "BR-549." Still in doubt? Google is your friend.
35
posted on
08/25/2008 2:44:53 PM PDT
by
Tenniel2
(You can't vote "present" in the Oval Office.)
To: doug from upland
To: Tenniel2
Whoa! I didn’t even notice that - rather funny, actually.
To: Tenniel2; Sibre Fan
Whoa! I didnt even notice that - rather funny, actually. Nor I. Thanks!
38
posted on
08/25/2008 6:41:45 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
(Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
To: cynwoody; doug from upland
Mark my words: This idiocy will rehabilitate Dan Rather’s historical reputation, because people will confuse the (genuine) expose of the forged National Guard memos with the (crackpot conspiracy theory) accusations about a forged Obama birth certificate.
39
posted on
08/26/2008 1:08:44 PM PDT
by
steve-b
(Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson