Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC: McCain Won't Choose Abortion Supporting Running Mate
Fox News ^ | August 19, 2008 | Carl Cameron

Posted on 08/19/2008 12:44:19 PM PDT by libstripper

As speculation grows around who John McCain will select as his vice presidential running mate next week, Republican National Committee officials said Tuesday that McCain is no longer considering former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge.

Several sources at the RNC told FOX News that in the last 36 hours, senior McCain advisers and aides have told RNC officials that McCain “got the message” last week that choosing a running mate who supports abortion rights would not be helpful.

(Excerpt) Read more at elections.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; abortion; election; mccain; prolifevote; rnc
If this comes true, we've just won the election.
1 posted on 08/19/2008 12:44:19 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Rush has spoken.


2 posted on 08/19/2008 12:45:44 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The anti-Abortion VP candidate talk has been floated by McCain campaign so we’ll be relieved when he picks Pawlenty or Romney and will have more impact with conservatives.


3 posted on 08/19/2008 12:46:35 PM PDT by Onerom99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Good. As more people learn about Obama, those who would even consider voting for him would be out of McCain’s reach no matter what.


4 posted on 08/19/2008 12:48:37 PM PDT by RPTMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I hope it is true that he will not choose a pro-choice VP.

McCain said very strongly last Saturday night:
“I have a 25-year pro life record in the Congress, in the Senate, and as president of the United States, I will be a pro life President and this presidency will have pro life policies. That’s my commitment, that’s my commitment to you.”

After that statement, a pro-life VP will most certainly flush down the drain any gains he made with very many conservatives. Why? Lack of trust....yet again!


5 posted on 08/19/2008 12:50:08 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
The anti-Abortion VP candidate talk has been floated by McCain campaign so we’ll be relieved when he picks Pawlenty or Romney and will have more impact with conservatives.

He won't pick Mitt "baggage" Romney. Picking a crpyto-pro-abort is almost as bad as picking one of the out and proud variety.
6 posted on 08/19/2008 12:50:29 PM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; TSchmereL
Several sources at the RNC told FOX News that in the last 36 hours, senior McCain advisers and aides have told RNC officials that McCain “got the message” last week that choosing a running mate who supports abortion rights would not be helpful.

This might be worth a rare out-of-subject ping to your lists. It is great that the message gets through but also sad that a message even has to be delivered.

7 posted on 08/19/2008 12:51:28 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (College kid: "Do you have a minute for Obama?" NVA: "Not now or ever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Romney looks better next to Lieberman or Ridge. That’s their move with floating this stuff.


8 posted on 08/19/2008 12:51:50 PM PDT by Onerom99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

“If this comes true, we’ve just won the election.”

I agree.


9 posted on 08/19/2008 12:52:11 PM PDT by Grunthor (When your only principle is winning, you value nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

What? Did they have to think about it for awhile?

Both candidates could have *pander bear* as their middle names.


10 posted on 08/19/2008 12:53:23 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

> If this comes true, we’ve just won the election.

Very nice, but do you see what McCain is doing? Why do you think he floated the Ridge trial balloon? He obviously wanted to be able to pander to the left. Of course we screamed bloody murder (literally), but really do you think choosing a pro-lifer as VP represents an honest change of mind from him? Do you think he’ll actually change his left-appeasing ways if he gets into office? Really???

Yep, McCain is better than Obama. So too is drowning to death better than burning to death. We’re on a leftward slide, we just get to control how fast we go.


11 posted on 08/19/2008 12:57:05 PM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Fred or Rick Santorum.


12 posted on 08/19/2008 12:58:50 PM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

That makes a lot of sense. I was thinking that Romney is probably the closest they can toe the line without ticking off the right. The problem is, he gives Obama an opening to blast McCain for blasting Obama on “changing his mind”.


13 posted on 08/19/2008 12:59:19 PM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Go Mitt. A good choice.


14 posted on 08/19/2008 12:59:30 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Well, nobody will change their expedient opinions without pressure. He floated the trial balloon, we screamed, and it worked. That’s the system.

I think McCain is so liberal he could easily get into the “personally opposed but whatever’s cool with you” camp. It’s up to us to keep him out of it.


15 posted on 08/19/2008 1:00:56 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

He best not pick Lieberman either.....


16 posted on 08/19/2008 1:01:27 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
I was so disappointed when Santorum lost. I put the blame squarely on Snarlin’ Arlen's shoulders.

I hope Toomey takes another shot at that fossil.

17 posted on 08/19/2008 1:02:13 PM PDT by Scarpetta (e pluribus victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Exactly, all McCain is doing is playing both ends against the middle.

Pretending to desire to put a Pro-Abortion VP on the ticket to bind the conservatives closer to him when he decides against it because “He gets it now” and showing the left that he really isn’t that conservative (Like everyone doesn’t already know this) and he tried, but just couldn’t overcome his base and win the election. (but he certainly deserves Kudos for trying <\SARCASM>)

This is pure manipulation on the McCain camp.


18 posted on 08/19/2008 1:02:26 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson