Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded
"Dunno ... a crazy quilt approach to carry regulations makes it damn difficult to stay in compliance. I don’t see this as doing good."

SO:
In the interest of uniformity, you'd prefer NOT to have teachers armed and able to defend our children against a murderous psychopath???

I don't think it would be all that hard for the average concealed-carry permitholder to figure out what a sign at a school's door means.

Or for that matter, said psychopath might well be put-off by a sign saying

"Armed teachers employed here"

4 posted on 08/19/2008 10:57:15 AM PDT by Redbob ("WWJBD" ="What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Redbob
Oh, please. Don't use that debating technique on me. There have been plenty of times where the state, especially when it pertains to a state constitutional clause, preempts local decision making and courts have backed that up. I'm saying Perry should show some balls and declare that CC on school grounds is allowed. The uniformity I seek is "shall not be infringed" in its original sense.
5 posted on 08/19/2008 11:06:15 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (College kid: "Do you have a minute for Obama?" NVA: "Not now or ever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson