What is the objection? It would cost too much?
%%%%%%
The baby was taken from the uterus as an act of abortion, not birth; but ‘it’ had the temerity to breathe! What’s a doctor or nurse to do? What they had been doing was putting ‘the products of abortion’ in a basin in the utility room until respirations ceased.
There are also documented eyewitness accounts of babies being smothered if they happened to breathe after an abortion-induced birth.
I understand it was a botched abortion.
I don’t understand why a legislator would vote AGAINST a law requiring lifesaving efforts to an aborted baby being born alive.
In other words why would a legislator vote against saving a baby’s life under such circumstances? Because say what you will, I believe there are few Americans who would be against saving those unfortunates’ infant lives. Thus a legislator voting against cannot possibly be doing so for the will of the voters?
Or maybe I’m being too pollyannish, maybe there’s a large subset of people out there who think it’s okay to smother living, breathing babies.