Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
This is pathetic. We have seemingly unlimited funds to spend on every nitwit socialist idiocy that can be imagined under Heaven or Earth, but when it comes to something that might actually help to advance the human condition by leaps and bounds the mini-minds in government can't seem to come up with the minimal amount of money it would take. Sickening.
8 posted on 08/11/2008 7:33:40 PM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Desron13
Hi Desron13

I share your despair, but I fear the issue is not one of money. You could give NASA ten times as much money and none of it would get into space; their main function is to distribute taxpayers' money to congressional districts, and has been for years.

I met Jeff Hanley when he came to Singapore and listened to his pitch - at about 8th grade level, it seemed. Afterwards I tried to ask him a few questions and he came across as a complete idiot.

Well, NASA propose to build a new heavy-lift vehicle called Ares-V. It is supposed (ha ha) to fly in 2018, and will have the same lift capacity as the Russian Energiya/Vulcan design which was tested in 1988. How's that for progress? NASA then plans to return to the Moon in (I quote their own website) "the 2020 timeframe".

For the record, 1.6 Saturn-V rockets (remember them?) could lift as much as one Ares-V, and could do so next year at about one-twentieth of the cost. So again, it's not about money.

[Saturn-V, 118 tonnes to LEO; Ares-V, 188 tonnes]

But I agree with a previous poster - build the realOrion.

40 posted on 08/12/2008 12:18:40 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson