Posted on 07/31/2008 5:40:33 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Yesterday, small cracks began emerging in the mainstream media wall of silence on the alleged John Edwards scandal. However, early this AM one of those cracks widened to the extent that there is now a major flow of information on this topic in the form of a report titled, "Facing questions, Edwards evades reporters," in Edwards own hometown newspaper, the Raleigh News & Observer (emphasis mine):
It was only three weeks ago that John Edwards was fielding media questions on his chances of filling the Democratic Party's vice presidential slot on Barack Obama's ticket or a potential Cabinet position in an Obama administration.
On Wednesday, however, the former U.S. senator and 2004 vice presidential nominee was eager to duck the press when the questions took a tabloid turn.
About a dozen reporters and photojournalists attended a speech Edwards gave to an AARP Foundation symposium on poverty and aging in Washington. Afterward, he avoided most of the waiting reporters, at least some of whom wanted to question him about recent reports in the National Enquirer that alleged an inappropriate relationship with a former campaign videographer.
Citing unnamed sources, the Enquirer published a story in October claiming that Edwards was having an affair with a woman who filmed a series of campaign videos. The story resurfaced last week in the online version of the Enquirer, which claimed that Edwards had visited the woman and their "love child" July 21 at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, Calif.
In October, the woman posted an online statement denying the first story. In December, an Edwards campaign worker claimed to be the father of the woman's then-unborn child.
On Wednesday, Edwards apparently ducked out a side area used by the kitchen staff in the fourth-floor ballroom of Washington's historic Hotel Monaco. Edwards emerged from a lower-level handicap ramp near the rear of the hotel with two men. When approached by a Charlotte Observer reporter, Edwards said, "Can't do it now, I'm sorry" and quickly walked past.
Asked what he was doing at the Beverly Hilton last week, Edwards said "sorry" and got into a waiting car with the other men.
No photographs or video of the alleged California hotel incident have been released by the Enquirer, which described in its online story its reporters' attempts to chase down Edwards. The tabloid reported he hid in a restroom to elude them.
The story has prompted some buzzing in the blogosphere but little public response from Edwards. At a July 23 speech in Houston, Edwards responded to a reporter's question about the Enquirer story by referring to it as "tabloid trash."
Wow! It sounds like Edwards is in the habit of recreating a Benny Hill chase scene whenever he appears at hotels nowadays. Perhaps the Yakety Sax music should be played over those hotel sound systems just to set the proper mood.
Meanwhile, a startlingly frank report appeared in yesterday's San Jose Mercury News as to why the major media has been avoiding this scandal. The title, "John Edwards sex scandal? Hey, you didn't hear it here," sets the theme for the story written by Jeff Thomas:
So what's all this about squeaky-clean Democrat John Edwards and a sordid sex scandal? What, you haven't heard? If that's the case, then maybe you're one of the few remaining Americans who get most of their news from those dead-trees-and-ink thingies.
Members of the so-called Main Stream Media - yes, including this one - have treated the story of an alleged Edwards affair as if it were just another space alien story out of the National Enquirer. But wait! It is indeed the Enquirer that is out in front on this story, but it appears they have slightly more to go on than a UFO sighting.
They say they caught Edwards taking a back elevator to a woman's Beverly Hilton Hotel suite at 2 a.m. last week, and when the stakeout team tried to talk to him about what he was doing there, he bolted back downstairs and hid in a bathroom for 15 minutes before security intervened. The Enquirer says it has photos (and video?) of the whole encounter.
It gets even stranger. The alleged other woman (remember, Edwards is married to Elizabeth Edwards, who is suffering from incurable cancer) is the woman that the Enquirer reported last October was pregnant with Edwards' child. The Edwards campaign's response to that was that, no, the child's father is actually a close, married, aide to Edwards. That's loyalty!
So far, there has not been a denial from either Edwards or the woman, who once produced videos for the Edwards presidential campaign, about the alleged escapade in Beverly Hills.
And if it's all a simple misunderstanding, if John Edwards was dropping by a hotel suite at 2 a.m. to say hello to a former campaign worker, then maybe someone should suggest to the politician that he come out and say that. Maybe it was his $500-a-cut hairdresser, for goodness sakes! In which case, money well spent. In any case, it doesn't seem like this is the kind of story that is going to fade into the mists of time. Especially in the slow-news days of August.
And, finally, in the cracks emerging in the MSM wall of silence category, I am pleased to report that Wikipedia has finally bowed to reality. The Wikipedia gatekeepers, after their stubborn stand to refuse to recognize that there actually is an alleged scandal, allowed their John Edwards page to be updated with this tidbit:
In July 2008, several news media outlets speculated that Edwards' chances for the vice presidency were harmed by allegations published in The National Enquirer that he had fathered a child outside his marriage, and that he had recently visited the child's mother at the Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, California. When questioned, Edwards responded by dismissing the allegations, stating "I've responded, consistently, to these tabloid allegations by saying I don't respond to these lies and you know that."
See, Wikipedia, it wasn't that hard to report on the fact that there is an alleged scandal causing quite a bit of commotion on the web and Benny Hill type chases in hotels. Meanwhile, your humble correspondent will be watching with great curiosity about how the MSM will try to keep the scandal report floodwaters from breaching their wall of silence.
What do you bet the Enquirer waits until the Democrat Convention to release the photos from their hotel encounter with Edwards?
The press conference video of Edwards denying this is just priceless. His face tells a different story than his lips!
I hear Letterman is telling jokes about it. That tells you Americans generally know about it. Big Media already looks foolish on the story. America depends on TV Comics and tabloids to find out what’s going on. Who needs Big Media?
Good to see that his inability to keep his wee weeny where it belongs cost him the shot. He definitely couldn't carry the fat chicks with cancer vote at this point.
18-month old children spew DNA into their general environment, but how do we get a sample from Edwards?
John Edwards is pretty much a nobody anymore.
Who’s bring the popcorn?
Um, he was being seriously consider for the veep slot or as an AG pick in an Obama administration. He might become a nobody as a result of this scandal but up to now he was a major force in the Democrat party.
He was just interviewed about his likelihood as being picked by Obama for Vice President. He was a former senator and a vice presidential candidate and ran third in the presidential race. You think he is a nobody? He is not relevant? So, let me get this straight, you think a potential VP candidate at the very top of the short list is a nobody? Okay......... Are you really that stupid, or just pretending?
Their desire to sell newspapers is slowly overcoming their allegience to the Dem Party.
BUMP-TO-THE-TRUTH!
Follow the slime trail he leaves behind.
gosh, edwards is lookin’
mo’ and mo’
like a vice presidential candidate!
secrecy on the democrat plantation, rap in the black house.
Bill Clinton could help.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=136553
Details on the Enquirer account of catching John Edwards at a Los Angeles hotel Monday night can be found in the related link. The woman in question is listed as the director of this campaign video. Edwards is addressing his comments to her.
Let's see, he consistently ran a very distant third behind the other two Democrat party candidates. He also failed to deliver his home state the last time he ran for Vice President. You have to be really clueless if you believe that this guy is anywhere near the top of the list of potential running mates.
LOL, you are not pretending!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.