8mm
Posted on 07/25/2008 4:36:28 PM PDT by wagglebee
Fresno, CA (LifeNews.com) -- Disability rights advocates and pro-life groups are speaking up in the case of Janet Rivera, an incapacitated California woman who had her food and water restored yesterday. They say Rivera's guardian was wrong to override her family and deny her the right to sustenance.
Rivera, 46, had a heart attack on February 2006 and she never regained consciousness. She has been on life support for two years.
As LifeNews.com has reported, on July 14 a court-appointed guardian removed her feeding tube despite her family's wishes.
After obtaining help from pro-life attorneys, the Rivera family won a court order to restore the feeding tube while the case continues. Now, a hearing is set for Tuesday of next week to make a more permanent decision.
Alex Schadenberg, the director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, calls the dispute a "very important case" that could have devastating effects for patients.
"If the courts decide that the public guardian has the right to make medical decisions for Rivera, and that the public guardian can dehydrate Rivera to death against the wishes of the family, then everyone who does not have a legal advanced directive will be able to die by dehydration," he explained.
He said he's worried that euthanasia advocates are pushing killing patients, even those like Rivera whose conditions aren't as difficult as others.
"Rivera is not otherwise dying, she is cognitively disabled and unlikely to return to a cognitive condition," he explained.
"If people who are cognitively disabled can be dehydrated to death, then the lives of many people with cognitive disabilities will be directly threatened when they experience significant health problems," Schadenberg worries.
Meanwhile, Right to Life of Central California says it stands with the family of Janet Rivera in demanding she not be starved to death.
“It’s one thing to allow a family member to die of natural causes from their illness,” Josh Brahm, the director of education and public relations for the group, told LifeNews.com. “It’s another thing to remove basic care like food and water from a disabled person.
"Food and water is not extraordinary medical treatment. They are not therapeutic nor do they treat diseases. Food and water are basic necessities for life. Unlike removing medical treatments, removing food and water will guarantee death" Brahm explained.
Brahm said all patients should be closely monitoring the case and the legal decisions to come.
“People need to realize that this could happen to them too,” says Brahm. “There are similar cases all over the country. They're just not getting the same media attention that Terri Schiavo did.”
Related web sites:
Right to Life of Central California - http://www.rtlcc.org
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - http://www.euthanasiaprevention.on.ca
Exactly!
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Janet Rivera Ping
Give Jeb Bush a call. He’ll know what to do. /sarc off
Janet Rivera update self ping.
Maybe the democraps can have judge Greer appointed as a ‘traveling judge’ to ride around the country playing executioner enabler for all!
They probably just haven’t thought of it yet.
Once you have met a few people who were “in a coma” or in a “vegetative state” and then saw them as they woke up and got up, and learned to walk and talk and dance and sing again, it makes you question the wisdom of the brain scans that “prove” the person is not ever going to wake up. And these people, when they do wake up, can tell you everything that was said in their room while they were “in a coma”
Exactly, and what will they think if they find out their families wanted to murder them (which isn't the case here, but certainly has been with others).
My suspicion is that the patient is on the public dole.
A feeding tube costs less than $100 a day, it really shouldn’t be an issue.
She was admitted to DeWitt Community Subacute Center in Fresno, which I am sure costs more than $100 a day. It may be a factor in the decision.
IOW, if the euthanasia advocates have their way we can rid ourselves of pesky sick relatives by means of starvation and dehydration instead of an injection of drugs the way we would euthanize a sick or injured pet cat. Great, now we don't have to worry about what to do with Grandma when she gets old and hard to care for, we just turn her over to the hospital and they will take it from there with the blessings of the state.
Hey wait just a doggone minute, if we can handle Grandma that way my kids could handle me that way too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.