Posted on 07/21/2008 11:23:49 AM PDT by camerakid400
A lot of them claim to be conservative and frequent FR.
No better nor worse than our use of the plural democrats, socialists and @$$hole$.
I suppose one category would fit them all .... hmmmm them ..... all.
You keep posting, we have your back.
see my tagline....
You stay classy, Weiner.
My neighbor is a teacher that works specifically with children that have autism. She calls the over diagnosis akin to the new ADHD fad. Unfortunately, the tons of children that have no parenting at home being diagnosed with it are crowding out the truly affected. Savage is right on. Talk to the front lines, forget the folks in pharmaceuticals pushing it and forget those in government pushing more programs and those parents looking for an excuse for children that don’t listen. It is all about the dollar. It had nothing to do with the actual affected.
Apparently the free PR he was getting for his battle with CAIR was quieting down and he had to find another way to get some press.
And just what does a three-year old know about “acting like a man”?
America is a supercollider of unalienable rights with so far a limited number of head-on collisions. But every day the anti-matter folks -- those who object to the right to express opinions contrary to theirs -- add more and more particles increasing the inevitability of an explosion.
Those folks are even threatening to drop the "Fairness Doctrine" particle into their stream. That will definitely be a head-on collision that will be felt coast-to-coast, border-to-border -- perhaps even felt around the world.
Savage is just a fake out to make a buck.
He’s a liberal who pretends to be a conservative in order to make conservatives look stupid. He’s an intentional parody. He exists because he serves the purpose of creating “straw man” arguments for the Left.
His private life (and his campaign donations) reveal him to be just another liberal.
Prove it.
Savage obviously has little practical experience with autism. He really should meet with some autistic children face to face, he would change his mind on how easily treatable the condition is by purely behavioral means.
It really is an epidemic. And it is surprisingly underreported by the usually hyperbolic mainstream media.
“He didn’t say there were faking it. He said it was a behavior problem, not a medical condition.
I think there is some truth on both sides. I think autism is a real medical condition, but I also agree that the criteria have become too vague and it has been over-diagnosed.”
You’re right, but his comments did suggest he believes that most children diagnosed as autistic can either will themselves into being normal or will get better if mom or dad just cracks the whip. That’s nonsense.
I am the father of an autistic son who is now in his mid-20’s. He can talk, but rarely does, and is for the most part loveable and giving. However, when he wants to be left alone it is better that he be left alone as he can “go off” quite quickly. He will warn you, though, when he does not want to be bothered.
Additionally, he has the touch of the idiot savant about him: He can do mathematics in his head at lightening speed - usually writing down the answers, and he has damned close to a photographic memory of signs he sees, music he hears, and movies he watches.
He was diagnosed as autistic when he was very young and has been like this his entire life. We did not medicate him - just gave him as much love, support, and care as possible. He will never get noticeably better. But that’s okay, because his mother, sisters, stepmother, and I all love him dearly.
As the father of a autistic child, I would like to tell Michael Savage that he can go to hell.
Exactly. And sometimes someones with an out of the mainstream opinion is shown to be an idiot and sometimes the mainstream comes to them. But shutting down out of the mainstream opinion does not change the facts whatever they are.
thanks
“Lots of Savage haters here!”
Nice rhetorical slight-of-hand, but it’s been done before: “You just hate Clinton!” (Or McCain ... etc.) so the onus is shifted/focus is changed from the subject’s purported outrageous conduct/statement to the critic.
“Prove it.”
Oh give me a break.
Think he’ll talk about this tonight?
LOL
Correct. He’s a good man of business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.