To: Graybeard58
I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that “IF” Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.
To: A_perfect_lady
Do you ask them why a country sitting on huge oil reserves needs nuclear power?
Liberals have an intricately constructed view of the World, and they can’t allow in any facts that would shatter their construction.
6 posted on
07/19/2008 11:11:49 AM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
To: A_perfect_lady
I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that IF Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really. So a follow-up question for these people is, "So you think nuclear power generators are the way to go to save the environment?"
7 posted on
07/19/2008 11:13:54 AM PDT by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
To: A_perfect_lady
I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that IF Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.Riiight. That's why he drained those marsh areas, which ruined vast areas that had previously been fertile.
13 posted on
07/19/2008 11:30:40 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: A_perfect_lady
Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.Yeah we saw that when he set fire to all of Kuwait's oil wells, didn't we?
26 posted on
07/19/2008 1:05:00 PM PDT by
Wil H
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson