[Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit]

Some how the “Obama is a communist” and “Obama is Hitler” thing is already getting tired. Obama doesn’t have a scapegoat (in Hitlers case Communists and Jews & Versailles) in his speeches. The comparison is a loser except for the extreme right that wouldn’t vote for him anyway. Hitler talked about heads rolling, Obama talks about healing divisions. In other words Hitler was telling the truth and people liked it. Obama, on the other hand probably has a hidden agenda. Stick to the left-wing comparisons and not the Nazi ones - it is too extreme and, in my opinion, inappropriate.

[OneLoyalAmerican]

Greetings Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit:

This is very creepy, but I think the author is spot on. Obama has named scapegoats: "Reaganomics," "the wealthy," and "NAFTA."

And in today's speech, Obama suggests creating a "civilian national security force" that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar U.S. Armed Forces.

Those who fail to learn from history are damned to relive it. Unfortunately, political correctness prohibits anyone from making such observations.

Cheers,
OLA

[Beckwith]

Stick to the left-wing comparisons and not the Nazi ones

Have you forgotten that Hitler was a socialist and leader of the National Socialists Party (Nationalsozialismus)?

Hitler was a socialist

[ripley]

“stick to the left-wing comparisons and not the nazi ones”

???

one and the same, are they not? (except for the methods of expropriation)