Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP strategist Mike Murphy chooses NBC over rejoining McCain camp
LA Times ^ | 7/9/08 | Andrew Malcolm

Posted on 07/09/2008 8:54:16 AM PDT by VA Voter

Mike Murphy, the garrulous Republican political strategist who helped Sen. John McCain dump the Karl Rove-led George W. Bush candidacy on its butt in the 2000 New Hampshire primary, is joining NBC News in an expanded role as political pundit.

[ed. DEFINES MURPHY'S ASSESSMENT OF MCCAIN'S CHANCES???]

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mccain; mikemurphy; murphy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2008 8:54:17 AM PDT by VA Voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

No bias here.


2 posted on 07/09/2008 8:56:13 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

Mike Murphy, the garrulous Republican political strategist who helped Sen. John McCain dump the Karl Rove-led George W. Bush candidacy on its butt in the 2000 New Hampshire primary...

How’d he do after New Hampshire? I thought so.


3 posted on 07/09/2008 8:56:42 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

follow the money


4 posted on 07/09/2008 8:58:49 AM PDT by HappyinAZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

Murphy is sooooo lame, why else would NBC hire him?


5 posted on 07/09/2008 8:59:51 AM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter
"Murphy was McCain’s top strategist in his 2000 campaign, which faded in South Carolina after the dramatic 19-point upset of the Texas governor in the Granite State."

Just another pretty face on NBC news.

6 posted on 07/09/2008 9:07:03 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter
The left likes him... he's pliable and shows little creativity in his observations.


7 posted on 07/09/2008 9:08:40 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The real reason.... that McCain is pretty much toast in 2008....A GOP Liberal against a DNC Liberal always favors the DNC.

I guess this guy realizes that the best way not to sink with the Titanic is to not board the Titanic in the first place


8 posted on 07/09/2008 9:08:56 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (John McCain's three favorite words: Made In China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Nice hair.


9 posted on 07/09/2008 9:10:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

I get a kick out of Murph.

He’s the one who called Hillary “Ed Muskie in a pantsuit”


10 posted on 07/09/2008 9:13:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Free Lazamataz, some shipping and handling charges may apply, some assembly required)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HappyinAZ
Smart move. After the election Murphy will still have his reputation intact and will be able to say, " I told you so", all the way to the bank. If he goes with McCain, he will become another Bob Shrum-the fellow who can't win one.

I honestly do not think that McCain can be managed. I believe his campaign will blunder from issue to issue and desperate ploy to desperate ploy without theme or coherence until the final act is pathetic. I hope I am wrong but I'm not here to wallow in false hope but to call them as I see 'em.


11 posted on 07/09/2008 9:14:32 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

“The real reason.... that McCain is pretty much toast in 2008”

That is precisely the conclusion the LA times wants you to draw. Thanks for playing.


12 posted on 07/09/2008 9:14:53 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Remarks by John McCain
Denver, CO
7/7/08

“Small businesses are the job engine of America, and I will make it easier for them to grow and create more jobs. My opponent wants to make it harder by imposing a “pay or play” health mandate on small business. This adds $12,000 to the cost of employing anyone with a family. That means new jobs will not be created. It means existing employees will have their wages cut to pay for this mandate. My plan attacks the real problems of healthcare — cost, availability and portability.”

“We need to keep the IRS from taking more of your income and making life harder for small business. If you believe you should pay more taxes, I am the wrong candidate for you. Senator Obama is your man. The choice in this election is stark and simple. Senator Obama will raise your taxes. I won’t. I will cut them where I can. Jobs are the most important thing our economy creates. When you raise taxes in a bad economy you eliminate jobs. I’m not going to let that happen.”

“Senator Obama’s tax increases will hurt the economy even more, and destroy jobs across this country. If you are one of the 23 million small business owners in America who files as an individual rate payer, Senator Obama is going to raise your tax rates. If you have an investment for your child’s education or own a mutual fund or a stock in a retirement plan, he is going to raise your taxes. He will raise estate taxes to 45 percent. I propose to cut them to 15 percent. His plan will hurt the American worker and family. It will hurt the economy and cost us jobs. For those of you with children, I will double the child deduction from $3,500 to $7,000 for every dependent, in every family in America. At a time of increasing gas and food prices, American families need tax relief and I, not my opponent, will deliver it.”

“My opponent believes America would be better off by refusing opportunities to sell in growing foreign markets. But protectionism not only puts a hidden tax on almost everything you buy, but it undermines American competitiveness and costs jobs.”

“When I’m president, I will order a stem to stern review of government, modernize how it does business and save billions of dollars. I will veto every single bill with wasteful spending. We aren’t going to continue mortgaging this country’s future for things Americans don’t want or need. My opponent has a very different record on this issue. He has sought millions upon millions of dollars in earmarks since his election to the Senate. In 2007 alone, Senator Obama requested nearly $100 million for earmark projects. I have never asked for a single earmark in my entire career. He supported the $300 billion pork laden agricultural subsidy bill. I opposed it. He voted for an energy bill stuffed with give-aways to oil compan ies at a time of record profits. I voted against it.”

“My opponent’s answer to the Lexington Project is no; no to more drilling; no to more nuclear power; no to research prizes that help solve the problem of affordable electric cars. For a guy whose “official seal” carried the motto, “Yes, we can,” Senator Obama’s agenda sure has a whole lot of “No, we can’t.” The Lexington Project will create millions of jobs, help protect our environment, improve our security, and solve the nation’s energy problems.”


13 posted on 07/09/2008 9:18:38 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

If only Harold Wolfson had gone to NBC instead of FNC.

Then all the ugly dogs would be on one channel.


14 posted on 07/09/2008 9:26:57 AM PDT by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter

Why as a political pundit? Why not just make him the new Tim Russert. Russert came out of the Cuomo administration, but was able to be totally non-biased, so why can’t this guy be non-partisan?


15 posted on 07/09/2008 9:28:55 AM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Voter
"Mike Murphy, the garrulous Republican political strategist who helped Sen. John McCain dump the Karl Rove-led George W. Bush candidacy on its butt in the 2000 New Hampshire primary..."

Well, how did his strategies work out for McCain in the Carolinas in '00?

lol!

16 posted on 07/09/2008 9:31:47 AM PDT by Redbob ("WWJBD" ="What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
I am not unaware that McCain is now running right. Indeed, I am delighted that he has finally come to his senses about, for one example among many, energy. My anguish comes from the knowledge that he comes very, very late to the party. Here is what I posted on the subject before the' 06 elections:

6. The house should pass every conceivable energy measure such as drilling in Anwar, drilling offshore and around Florida etc. providing for refineries, providing for nuclear power plants and let the Democrats and the Rinos oppose them and create a climate in which the people can direct their rage about gas prices at the Democrats.

7. The reality is of course is it's all too late for this and any other intelligent policies which might have saved the Republican Party from the disaster which is facing us. Many of our problems have been brought on by Iraq and there too we could have done much better in a public-relations sense. Alas it is all too late now. There is nothing left but to go the polls and vote for the most conservative man on the ticket who has a chance of winning. Let's fight the good fight and go down like soldiers.


17 posted on 07/09/2008 9:38:39 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“I honestly do not think that McCain can be managed. I believe his campaign will blunder from issue to issue and desperate ploy to desperate ploy without theme or coherence until the final act is pathetic. I hope I am wrong but I’m not here to wallow in false hope but to call them as I see ‘em.”

Perhaps you and I are following different campaigns so just for the hell of it why dont you in DETAIL lay out EXACTLY what McCain is doing wrong and then draw a parallel with what we are hearing from the inside the beltway geniuses is a “brilliant” campaign. Help all of us understand what Hussein is doing that is so “brilliant”. Is it his 180 on every single issue? Is he being brilliant because the media says so? Do you believe EVERYTHING you read in the lib media? And just WHAT is McCain doing wrong? be specific, “jumping from issue to issue” doesn’t cut it> I have watched him, he speaks about Iraq, same message as always, he speaks about abortion, same message as always, he has spoken about gun rights, no change there either. Now he has said he will balance the budget in his first term. Hussein as said “impossible”, not why it is, just is and he apparently will not even try because “to much needs to be done and investments (read tax increases) need to be made.

McCain has called for 10 debates, Hussein has run after saying “I’ll meet McCain anytime any place” McCain’s message is experience and character, legitimacy and focus while Hussein’s message so far is in essence, “It isn’t what I’ve said it’s what I am saying now”

So tell me about how awful McCain’s campaign is and do so without plagiarizing the panelists on the Brit Hume show who seem to hold the same views you do but yet cannot explain why he is so close in the polls nor why Hussein’s negatives have sky rocketed since the lib primary ended and McCain coincidentally started to run what many here are calling “awful” ads.

Feel free to get together with your other McClain bashing friends in order to come up with some sort of an explanation that makes at least a bit of sense.


18 posted on 07/09/2008 9:46:35 AM PDT by lexusppd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd
What you said


19 posted on 07/09/2008 10:09:51 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terrible agitated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd
You were admitted to practice here on May 2, 2008, barely a month ago. You have not been here long enough to address me, unsolicited, in the tones you have used. Wipe the snot off your nose, apologize, put a civil tongue in your head, and I will respond.

Otherwise, go sodomize yourself.


20 posted on 07/09/2008 10:27:13 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson