And why I think the study is "suspect".
My plants from last year are blooming in profusion. Didn't cost me a thing, this year. Am I getting what I paid for?
This study is "suspect". Someone somewhere is playing economic tiddlywinks under the chimera of "science".
“For individuals who are eating fish as a method to control inflammatory diseases such as heart disease, it is clear from these numbers that tilapia is not a good choice,” the article says. “All other nutritional content aside, the inflammatory potential of hamburger and pork bacon is lower than the average serving of farmed tilapia.”
Anyone besides me smelling the BS meter going off the charts? Which is perhaps the Point A of the groupist MSM/Dem agenda. Meaning, meat is bad but lesser expensive fish is worse? HA. Again I say HA!
The second peg of the agenda in this article is to boon "consumers" to purchase fish they are currently NOT. Salmon Fishing is halted along the West Coast. So, what other "fishing industries" will be aided by this type of article? FDA, for example? Does it benefit by getting more agenda, thereby growing its bureacracy base?
My, my. England has a problem with its "racist foods" program.
But I see where our boobs have joined up with their boobs across the Pond.