Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A New Call for Jessica's Law in Vermont
WCAX News ^ | July 5, 2008 | Andy Potter --

Posted on 07/06/2008 8:10:56 AM PDT by george76

Brook Bennett's murder has brought back calls for a tougher law against adults who sexually prey on children. More than thirty states -- but not Vermont -- have enacted Jessica's law, setting a 25-year minimum prison sentence for convicted child sex offenders.

"When a person is sexually assaulted, a minor is sexually assaulted, it's my opinion that they should go to jail for 25 years," Dubie told Channel 3. "That's very simple and that's what Jessica's Law calls for. I'm also asking that we reconsider what the governor proposed last legislative session, and that's civil confinement."

House Judiciary committee chairman Bill Lippert (D-Hinesburg) opposed both proposals -- and both died.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Vermont; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bennett; brookebennett; children; jessica; jessicaslaw; michaeljacques; vermont

1 posted on 07/06/2008 8:10:56 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

But wouldn’t enacting Jessica’s Law actually take away criminals rights in Vermont? Why, that is just not good liberal Vermont practice...!!!


2 posted on 07/06/2008 8:14:23 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
VT has been an open door for perverts for decades. If they crack down now, they might go into irreversible economic shock.
3 posted on 07/06/2008 8:37:18 AM PDT by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melinda

Vermont needs a new motto.

Vermont! Kingdom of Filth!
Put that on your state seal all you leftist #$%^&*!!


4 posted on 07/06/2008 8:45:31 AM PDT by redstateconfidential (If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

“When a person is sexually assaulted, a minor is sexually assaulted, it’s my opinion that they should go to jail for 25 years,” Dubie told Channel 3.

__________

Sad, serious subject - but someone please arrest this man for grammar violations.


5 posted on 07/06/2008 8:48:19 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m waiting for Bill O’Reilly to get back from vacation to go after these Vermont judges and legislators again.

Why would the government of any state set out a red carpet for pedophiles?


6 posted on 07/06/2008 10:18:32 AM PDT by Palladin (Obama --the black Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

They maybe pedophiles too ?

Remember the ACLU Virginia President who recently got caught .


7 posted on 07/06/2008 10:26:36 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76

Does this include 18-year-old high school seniors who get it on with their 17-year-old boyfriends and girlfriends? There are not enough jail cells on the planet...


8 posted on 07/06/2008 11:32:27 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

” The law is named after Jessica Lunsford, a young Florida girl who was raped and murdered in February 2005 by John Couey, a previously convicted sex offender. “

Not for : 18-year-old high school seniors who get it on with their 17-year-old boyfriends and girlfriends


9 posted on 07/06/2008 11:48:57 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: george76

Bad cases make bad law. I agree that grown men who prey on pre-pubescent children should be hanged in public on the first offense. I don’t think that an 18-year-old high school girl who screws her 17-year-old boyfriend should be punished at all. Where does this proposed law draw the line?


10 posted on 07/06/2008 11:55:54 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: heartwood
someone please arrest this man for grammar violations.

And after that, maybe he can explain his intentions clearly, using language everyone can understand. Someone who rapes a small child should go to prison for life, if not face hanging, but "sexual assault" covers a whole host of sins, some rather minor, if they even are sins. If someone is relieving himself in the woods and a small girl wanders by and sees his exposed anatomy is he guilty of sexual assault? Given the percentage of the American public who are hyper-puritanical prudes, and given the percentage of prosecutors out to make names for themselves, it is not an academic question.

11 posted on 07/06/2008 11:59:20 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

Age of consent should be 15 or 16. 18 is rather arbitrary. While were at it, let’s end schooling at the 9th or 10th grade.


12 posted on 07/06/2008 12:00:14 PM PDT by Clemenza (You Shoot Me in a Dream, You Better Wake Up and Apologize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Glad to see that I am not the only one who thinks that we need to think through where we are going with this.


13 posted on 07/06/2008 12:00:32 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Where does this proposed law draw the line?

How about when a 12-year-old niece is kidnapped, raped, and killed.

Michael Jacques kidnapped... Brooke Bennett.


14 posted on 07/06/2008 12:10:06 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Yeah, O’Reilly will put on a great show about this. He’ll be like Ted Baxter on acid.


15 posted on 07/06/2008 12:11:59 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Many of the concerns people have on this thread (two teens having sex, accidental exposure etc) are answered in the actual legislation. The specific crimes the law applies to are spelled out. It is not simply any sexually related crime.

For example: California's Prop 83

Scroll down to page 127 for the text of the legislation.

16 posted on 07/06/2008 12:37:16 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Thanks.

The law can be written to seperate two older teenagers versus a pre teen with an adult.

It seems that the judges are forcing this issue by their liberal activism releasing adult predators.


17 posted on 07/06/2008 1:19:02 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george76
Perhaps DEMOCRATIC State of Mass. senator Fagin should be asked about this???
18 posted on 07/06/2008 1:24:44 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
How about when a 12-year-old niece is kidnapped, raped, and killed.

OK, that makes the second time you've dodged the question. I get it. People who rape and kill young children are bad and should be punished harshly. I agree. Chop their heads off in the court house square for all I care.

But as I read the proposed law, an 18-year-old high school girl who gets caught in bed with her 17-year-old boyfriend would be subject to a 25-year mandatory prison sentence. I think it's absurd.

-ccm

19 posted on 07/06/2008 1:28:30 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

We agree in this :

the proposed law, an 18-year-old high school girl who gets caught in bed with her 17-year-old boyfriend would be subject to a 25-year mandatory prison sentence. I think it’s absurd.


20 posted on 07/06/2008 1:36:19 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson