Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims

Israeli Insider ^ | July 3, 2008

[Sherman Logan]

I’ve not seen a single shred of evidence he was born in Kenya, or indeed that Mom ever visited Kenya.

Since Dad had another wife complete with kids there, it seems unlikely he’d take the new girl along to meet the family.

[yorkie]

I see you learned at an early age that “the only way to catch a fly is with vinegar”. (Your teech was wrong, btw.....)

[Dick Bachert]

“People get the government they deserve.” Joseph deMaistre.

And when people become THIS freaking STUPID and inattentive to their freedoms, THIS is the candidate they deserve.

1 minute satirical Obama video here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR6b-kWncI4

Hurry before some diversity loving (RIGHT!) Obamaniac at YouTube pulls it.

[airedale]

Since Obama’s father was already married when he married Obama’s mom the marriage was probably not legal. That would mean while his father wasn’t a US citizen his only “legal” parent was. Even if he was born outside the US because of his American mother he’d be a citizen (see Montana v. Kennedy http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=nytimes&navby=case&court=us&vol=366&invol=308&pageno=314) but he’d be a “citizen by birth” not a “natural born citizen” The question if he was not born in Hawaii like some have speculated is a “citizen by birth” eligible. It’s never been adjudicated and our current Supreme Court would probably decide he’s eligible with Kennedy providing the swing vote.

Personally I think this is an exercise in barking up the wrong tree and I’m not going to get to excited about the birth certificate issue for now.

[calex59]

I see you learned at an early age that “the only way to catch a fly is with vinegar”. (Your teech was wrong, btw.....)

I have no idea what you are talking about, but I call 'em like I see 'em. If you are offended TS. as far as Teech, I will admit I don't know what that is so if I was wrong on whatever it is there is a strong possibility it is because I haven't a clue as to what you mean. Personally I don't think I have anything wrong but everyone to their own opinion.

[BallyBill]

A Rubik’s Cube is good time waster. This issue is going nowhere.

[airedale]

If he was born in Kenya unless his parent was part of the military or the embassy he’d be a “citizen by birth” and not a “natural born citizen” which is required by the Constitution. Of course the “citizen by birth” issue has never been adjudicated as far as I know and SCOTUS could decide that the terms “natural born citizen” and citizen by birth are one in the same. Good old Kennedy would be the swing vote.

[smoketree]

A Rubik’s Cube is good time waster. This issue is going nowhere.

It’s going bowhere because the rats and the rat media don’t think laws apply to them.

If he is not eligible and they say nothing what happens if he is elected and then it comes out that he is not eligible to hold office? He will be removed. Do we need the disruption?
And if he does get elected and it comes out and the rats still want him to remain in office what good will any laws be?

[yorkie]

From your post.........Quote, here: "Are you really that stupid"

and another quote, here: "I feel they would be lost on you since you are obviously incurably stupid"

A good teacher (teech) taught us all, many years ago - that you can't catch a fly with vinegar. If you want to catch a fly, you must use honey.

Posters that think they will win over another poster by name calling, were obviously taught wrong. That's all, hunny. No big deal. You just keep up the name calling - I am sure many posters will 'side' with you. Not.

[Balding_Eagle]

I think it’s important because someone who claims to be a Homeland Security document expert is involved. Beyond that, I don’t much care. He is the nominee. Let these rumors dog him.

[smoketree]

So if he is NOT eligible to be president you don’t care?

[brannon]

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

[yldstrk]

Have you seen a shred that he was born in the US? Just saying..........

[freespirited]

I’ve not seen a single shred of evidence he was born in Kenya, or indeed that Mom ever visited Kenya.

I guess it depends on your definition of evidence. An online AA publication claims he was born in Kenya, and I have read reports that his relatives make the same claim. I have seen no official documentation of any of this, although FWIW I have seen rumors that a Kenyan birth cert exists.

My suspicion has always been that this is not about where he was born but about him being an illegitimate child. The original birth cert would show that.

[Polarik]

What was the first image posted on the Net? Kos's second image.

 

What was the second image posted on the Net? Kos's first image.

 

What came before the Kos images?

 

The "missing link," namely,  a shadowy figure called, Dr. X, who produced the very first, scanned image that was later forwarded to the Kos.

 

Was this a scan of Obama's genuine Certification of Live Birth?

 

OH, HECK, NO!!

The Genesis of the faked images in order of their creation, but not in order of their appearance will be, once and for all, revealed after you read the preliminary work that led to these conclusions.

Sorry to disagree with other theorists on this matter, but my analyses prove that OpenDNA’s images -- both of them -- came directly from the Kos image. Absolutely, 100%, no doubt. The "little dot" as one person has called it is actually an anomaly -- a piece of junk on the scanner glass or on the COLB itself.

 

Regardless, itv is a BIG Boo-Boo on the Kos image that appears smaller on the OpenDNA image -- a definite sign of being copied.

What is throwing people off are the differences in the resolution of the images and not the size or quality.

Nearly all monitors are scaled at 96 DPI, which is why web images are scaled to 98 DPI -- to look best when seen by a monitor. The OPLNY reason, then, why OpenDNA's image appears of "higher quality" is there difference in resolution.

 

 Making an image of higher resolution -- like what the Kos image happens to be, namely, 300 DPI, is COUNTERPRODUCTIVE with web graphics; i.e., they look WORSE WHEN ENLARGED.

 

OpenDNA's images are 800 x 781 - exact scale reductions from 2427 x 2369, and by changing the resolution to 96 DPI from 300 DPI was not done just to make them look better -- but also to make one think that, "Hey maybe this was the original image derived from a scanner, since the default resolution of scanners is 96 DPI."

 

But, when you look at the Kos image and the OpenDNA's images under edge detection, and at the same size, the "dot," the anomaly you mentioned looks huge compared to the tiny dot of OpenDNA's.

 

Because, when you try to enlarge OpenDNA's image up to the original size of the Kos, that "well-defined, and large boulder" on the Kos looks positively smeared on OpenDNA's.

 

To compare apples to apples instead of apples to guacamole, I'm going to slice off the upper right-hand corner of each image after setting the images to the same size and resolution of OpenDNA's image scaled back up to 2427 x 2369, 96 DPI.

 

All images will be saved at 100% JPG quality. The resulting slice dimensions will be around 786 x 268px. I'm also going to dispense with any image enhancement because the differences are plainly visible to the naked eye.

 

I'm also going to leave the images unmarked because, by now, you should know that the "dot" in question lies right below the E in "CERTIFICATION" and directly to the right of "STATE OF HAWAII." Now, drum roll please.... Here is the Kos' larger image at 2427 x 2369 with the resolution now set @ 96 DPI Here is the OpenDNA image, originally scaled down to 800 x 781 @ 96 DPI, restored to the original Kos size of 2427 x 2369:

 

 

Which of these looks a lot clearer, the Kos or the OpenDNA? Unless you left your contacts on the night table, the "big dot" on the Kos is much clearer, as are all of the letters. Now, let's take the first Smears image, which was 1024 x 1000 @ 300 DPI -- exactly the same as the very first Kos image posted (which was, also, a proportionate reduction in size alone).

 

 

 

 

Again, not as clear as the Kos image, BUT clearer than the OpenDNA images. Check out the differences between STATE OF HAWAII on the Smears versus OpenDNA. Notice anything? First off, there are more artifacts on OpenDNA's slice than on Smears slice.

 

More importantly -- the fonts closely resemble each other, but no OpenDNA's are not the same as either the Kos or the Smears when looked at under the same magnification. The difference is not an artifact. You can also see that the absolute positions of the type differ from both the Kos and the Smears, leading to one conclusion.

 

Open DNA, like "Dr X," literally started with an almost blank canvas, wiping out all of the type, both field names and data. "Dr. X," is the unknown person to whom I refer as the one producing the original scanned image that wound up in the hands of the Kos.

 

That the fonts are slightly different in shape and position should ring a few bells, don't you think?

 

The last image I'll show you is the reduced image that the Smears used to replace the first one they had (which, as we've seen was a direct copy of the Kos).

 

Instead of the dimensions of the new image being proportionate, they are 585 x 575 @ 100 DPI which is off by 4 pixels, but is off 200 DPI in resolution.

 

A significant difference designed to obscure the detail in the image -- as many of you astute observers have noted. BTW, ONLY the Kos images show the seal under edge detection. The ALLEGED higher quality OpenDNA brought back up to 2427 x 2369 @ 96 DPI shows squat!

 

 

 

(NOTE: this is obviously not the entire image -- it is just the area where the seal should be. The entire image is nearly 6MB -- too long to post, but it is also on my Photobucket album._ THE MISSING "MAGIC SEAL."

 

That's the penalty for reducing the original Kos image down in size and resolution. Remember, in my blog, The Greater Evil, I noted that one could reproduce the edge-detected, smaller Smears image by first reducing the original, larger Kos image down to the same size and resolution of the Smears image, and then apply edge detection.

 

The process of edge detection, not only changed the pattern of the background, it made the entire image magenta!

 

 

Despite the yucky color, notice how the background has changed from a series of lines to a crosshatched one. Guess what? OpenDNA's images have the same pattern:

 

 

 

 

Now, rather than cut-and-paste the entire post I placed on my blog, and make this comment way too long to read in one sitting, you may visit my blog for the entire analysis.

 

To conclude: In the beginning, there was Dr X. Dr X. took a certified COLB, that DID NOT BELONG TO OBAMA, scanned it, and then proceeded to Photoshop out two of the three folds, and all of the field headers and data, using pieces of the background and the HEALING tool to blend them in -- that is why the Kos seal is so faint.

 

Then, with a blank canvas on which to paint his "masterpiece of fakery," freshly typed in the filed names and the MODIFIED data fields to make it look like a COLB from BHO.

 

Dr X then gave it up to the Kos, who then proceeded to proudly display it on its web page. Meanwhile, back at the Obama ranch, news of the posted image hit the Obamanites like a bombshell, and they proceeded to copy the newly-minted image, while making plans to post it on their "Fight the Smears" site.

 

BEFORE they could do that, the authenticity of the Kos image was challenged by OpenDNA, and in a move they have regretted, challenged OpenDNA to produce a faked COLB. He doubled their dismay by producing two from their original image: one totally blank, except for the field and date for the island of birth and time of birth -- both simply left there by OpenDNA as he proceeded to blot out the rest of the fields and data.

 

In his second rendition, he entered that weird name for the child field. The "Smears shmucks" were caught, flatfooted. They quickly slammed down their direct copy of the Kos image, and claimed, "Here is his birth certificate," after weakly countering the argument that BHO was not born in the USA.

 

Realizing the dumb move of posting a really good copy of the fake that was open to inspection, the Smears shmucks pulled it down and replaced it with one almost half its size. They also removed the "Here is his birth certificate," claim!

 

So, instead of seeing an image tied to a counterargument verified by the COLB, we just have a totally different argument, followed by an orphaned image.

 

OK, now. Who's da' Man?

[chaosagent]

“I’ve not seen a single shred of evidence he was born in Kenya, or indeed that Mom ever visited Kenya.

Since Dad had another wife complete with kids there, it seems unlikely he’d take the new girl along to meet the family.”

Apparently several of the family memebers from the African side have said that he was actually born in Kenya.

His father was Muslim. Why would there be a problem with bringing another wife home?

[MattinNJ]

Clearly, you da man.

[syriacus]

Would Obama be the first US President who was the son of American emigrants?

[llandres]

It matters less where he was born than his philosophy. That’s what the American people deserve to know.

For those of us who actually care about his philosophy and stand on issues, we already know more than enough to be afraid. For the many, many millions who’ve drunk the BHO koolaid (including all the media), they DON’T CARE and he can simply do no wrong whatsover. Maybe the only hope of stopping this awful man IS on a technicality. We need to use whatever we can.

[llandres]

Something is fishy about his birth certificate and he doesn’t seem to be in any hurry to produce it to end the speculation.

Come on, Bill/Hill, get your cadre of PI’s on this (or maybe they’ve been steadily working on it).