[DaveyB]

...for the wrong reasons.

I STRONGLY concur. I am staunchly pro-life, but the reasoning of the court is just plain wrong.

The First Amendment means nothing if it doesn’t mean the right to show people things they don’t want to see.

The same reasoning could be used to demand pornography on the sidewalks or in the schools. They inadvertently provided a defense for every lewd flasher, sick artist and racial bigot.

[cla62]

Yes, this is kind of like the aclu helping out a cause on the right. Their are ulterior motives at work here. Be afraid!!