Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/25/2008 4:10:40 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

I’ve got an old James Brown DVD here. After “Popcorn” comes “Licking Stick.”


2 posted on 06/25/2008 4:13:33 PM PDT by toddlintown (Morons; all of 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The only solution I see is to launch them at Iran before they accidently detonate.

All of them.


3 posted on 06/25/2008 4:15:52 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I COULD catch AIDS and die an awful death too. With my lifestyle and age, that’s a very remote possibility. I’m thinking the chances of this nuclear scenario playing out is equally a very remote possibility.


4 posted on 06/25/2008 4:16:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Mmmmm ... Popcorn ...


5 posted on 06/25/2008 4:17:12 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
warheads could set off a chain reaction "like popcorn" if they were accidentally dropped


6 posted on 06/25/2008 4:19:18 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (the media vs. the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

TicketMaster? StubHub? eBay?


7 posted on 06/25/2008 4:22:56 PM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The typical scenario would see the weapon being dropped from a crane while being loaded on or off a submarine.

I would think that a Trident warhead going off on the dock or on the sub deck would totally fubar anything and everything in sight, and no mechanical safety design could withstand a nuclear fireball a few yards away. I would think that a warhead going off in the "Sherwood Forest" launch tubes would vaporized everything instantly, so how could it be physically possible to safety the other warheads as they are being vaporized?

I guess I need to read up on designing thermonuclear-proof-at-50-feet hardware.

8 posted on 06/25/2008 4:26:25 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ( They told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

so don’t drop ‘em!


9 posted on 06/25/2008 4:27:08 PM PDT by txroadkill (Liberals believe that the only oppressed people in Cuba are the terrorist in GitMo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

1700 atomic warheads that could go off at any minute? Whats the problem? Why does Britain have 1700 warheads?


10 posted on 06/25/2008 4:28:51 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I think this article is overstating things.

Maybe they would go off like Pop-Tarts or Toasters Strudels, but not popcorn. For that they would need to be near cellphones.


12 posted on 06/25/2008 4:36:34 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Obviously, they need warning labels on their warheads:

Dropping nuclear warhead could be hazardous to humanity.

Do not lubricate outside of warhead.

Rub your hands on yhour pants before attempting to carry warhead.

Scratch yourself BEFORE picking up warhead.

Loud popping sounds should be considered warnings of the Apocolypse.


17 posted on 06/25/2008 5:21:31 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson