It's Past Time to Expand Domestic Refining Capacity

Townhall.com ^ | June 23, 2008 | Rep. Joe Pitts and Rep. Phil English

[K-oneTexas]

It's Past Time to Expand Domestic Refining Capacity
Rep. Joe Pitts and Rep. Phil English

With the price of gas well over $4 a gallon nationwide, with no end to the high prices in sight, what is Congress doing? Voting on legislation to regulate the import, export, transport, and sale of “nonhuman primates.” This is not a joke, though it must seem like one to the American public. Instead of voting on a single bill to increase American made energy this week, Congress instead voted on H.R. 2964, the Captive Primate Safety Act.

The American people must be rightly furious that Congress continues with their business as usual, as if families aren’t paying $70 to fill up their minivans so they can drive to work, or take their kids to soccer practice.

In light of this situation, House Republicans have taken to utilizing a little used procedural tool called a discharge petition, in order to highlight the difference between our conference and the Democrat Majority on the very serious issue of energy security.

We have teamed up to offer a discharge petition to H.R. 2279, a bill that would expand our domestic oil refining capacity by setting aside three closed military bases to use as sites to build new refineries.

A new refinery has not been built in the United States since 1976, and the refineries that we do have are operating at or near capacity.

In fact, in 2007, according to the Energy Information Administration, the United States imported 148 million barrels of finished gasoline for use in our cars and trucks. That is on top of the billions of barrels of crude oil we imported.

For too long, we have not taken the proper steps to strengthen the energy infrastructure here in the United States that will make us energy secure.

Instead, for decades now, we have depended on oil, both crude and refined, from abroad. Often times, this oil comes from unfriendly nations, and the money we send to these states gets used in nefarious ways against our very own interests.

The time has come to make the investments in our nation’s energy infrastructure to help reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

There is no doubt, we must continue to invest in the future with renewable and alternative technologies like wind, solar, biomass, geothermal and the like. But we need more time to invest in these technologies.

In fact, renewable energy sources—hydroelectric, geothermal, wind, solar, and biomass— only met about 7 percent of America’s total energy needs in 2006, according to the Energy Information Administration. No matter how much we would like to say we can quickly wean this nation off it’s addiction to fossil fuels, there simply is no quick fix.

So, in the mean time, while we continue to develop the renewable and alternative technologies of tomorrow, we must produce more fuel here at home today.

However, even if we were to produce more oil, we simply do not have the capacity to refine it in order to turn it into the fuel we use to power our cars and trucks.

Massive regulations and skyrocketing litigation costs have prevented the construction of a new refinery for over three decades. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita have demonstrated how important a sound and reliable energy infrastructure is to America’s economy.

Less than a week after Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf, the average retail price for regular unleaded increased by 46 cents because nearly half of our nation’s refining capacity is located along the Gulf Coast.

H.R. 2279 would address one of the largest hurdles to building a new refinery: finding land. It would direct the President to designate three closed military bases as suitable for the construction of an oil refinery.

Once identified, the bases could be set aside for two years so that oil companies could be invited to purchase the land from the government. Finding land can be a very difficult challenge for a group that wishes to build a new refinery.

By using a closed military base, we can provide an alternative to communities that will need something to fill the void left by departing servicemen, and we can address one of our nation’s most important energy infrastructure issues at the same time.

It is unfortunate that Republicans have been forced to use procedural motions to force Congress’s hand on the energy issue, but the stakes are too high. The American people are sick and tired of a Congress that cannot seem to address an issue that is so negatively affecting families across the country.

[K-oneTexas]

Rep. Joe Pitts represents the 16th Congressional District of Pennsylvania. Rep. Phil English represents the 3rd Congressional District of Pennsylvania.

[Philly Nomad]

This is pathetic. Supposedly business-savvy congressmen think Oil companies want to spend billions of dollars to lower their profit margin.

[kcm.org]

What a fairy tale as America is going to “vote” overwhelmingly for a veto-proof Congress to protect America's environment!!

[Eric in the Ozarks]

It might be worthwhile to site a new refinery near existing crude and finished product pipelines. Supplying an oil refinery by truck doesn’t work very well.

[EDINVA]

Lowering their profit margin(s) might be preferable to some Dems’ idea of socializing the industry.

[KEmom]

They are going the right way - the use of closed military bases may not make sense, but the premise that Congress is voting on ridiculous legislation should be highlighted and screamed on the highest mountain. They should be revoking legislation already passed that has crippled and hampered our energy independence.

[decimon]

Captive Primate Safety Act

I thought I'd cease to be a captive primate when I left the Army just to learn my real captor is Congress.

[Melchior]

A new, ultramodern refinery should be coming on board by 2010 in the Dakotas. Ironically, it is privately funded and was conceived as an operation that would refine Canadian oil brought in by pipeline. I believe it could also be expanded to include oil derived from the Bakken shale region of eastern Montana - Western Dakotas. We know how to build refineries, but investors just simply refuse to play the enviromarxist game as played by East Coast elitists and West Coast mamma’s boys, All Americans suffer as a consequence.

[EdReform]

A new, ultramodern refinery should be coming on board by 2010 in the Dakotas.

The voters approved it, however the Green Party Wing of the Democrat Party are planning to file a lawsuit to stop it; like they did in Illinois:

Greens Thwart Gasoline Production

"... The Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council, or NRDC, successfully pressured the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to block ConocoPhillips’ expansion of its Roxana, Ill., gasoline refinery, which processes heavy crude oil from Canada, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

The project would have expanded the volume of Canadian crude processed from 60,000 barrels per day to more than 500,000 barrels a day by 2015. After the Illinois EPA had approved the expansion, the green groups petitioned the federal EPA to block it, alleging ConocoPhillips wasn’t using the best available technology for reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.

Apparently, the plant’s planned 95 percent reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions and 25 percent reduction in nitrogen oxides wasn’t green enough..."

[shove_it]

HR 2279 proposes refineries on closed military bases for supplying the military. See post #3 on this thread as a possible solution for supplying refined products for civilian consumption:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2035624/posts

[an amused spectator]

In fact, in 2007, according to the Energy Information Administration, the United States imported 148 million barrels of finished gasoline for use in our cars and trucks. That is on top of the billions of barrels of crude oil we imported.

148 million x 55 gallons = ~ 8.14 billion gallons

That's about 2 years gasoline usage for 2 medium-large states.

[OKIEDOC]

148 million x 55 gallons = ~ 8.14 billion gallons

Should Read:

148 million x 42 gallons = 6.216 billion gallons

[RightWhale]

If the intent is to expand fuel production with new plants, build coal to liquid. Oil refineries are not a sensible investment at this point.

[an amused spectator]

Thanks.

Wonder why I never read about the 55 gallon versus 42 gallon thingee in the Main Stream Media? (It's not like I did three weeks worth of research before I started casting blame in the gasoline price mess!)

It's not because they're trying to keep the electorate ignorant, is it? ;-)

These are numbers that should be rolling off the tongue of every eighth-grader...

[OKIEDOC]

No problem, it's a common mistake.

During college I used to gage tanks for a major oil company.

I would doubt that most teachers would know that oil comes in a 42 gallon barrel.

Yet these same teachers would say they do not want a nasty oil well in their neighborhood.