the convention isn’t until august.. i thought. why are they pushing to get this settled before the convention? wtf is with that?
waiting until the convention is why most people would want to be super delegates... to be able to weasel as much as possible from the various candidates
liberals.. changing the rules whenever its in their best interest. brilliant
the convention isn’t until august.. i thought. why are they pushing to get this settled before the convention? [what's] with that?Isn’t this CHANGING their nomination rules while the election is in play?Are they afraid that something may come out while all eyes are on the sacred Golden Child that may cost him the nomination?
Barack Obama was SELECTED not ELECTED.
20 posted on June 4, 2008 9:02:50 PM EDT by weegee
. . . liberals.. changing the rules whenever its in their best interest. brilliant
If the DNConvention isn't actually what decided the nomination of the the party for president, the whole primary system, which after all merely selects delegates to the convention [or at least so we are told] is a fraud.Therefore, any Big Journalism coverage of the "convention" will be an in-kind contribution to the DNC.
. . . are Dean and Pelosi demanding that the super "delegates" to the "convention" decide on the VP by Friday, too?
McCain's posture will make this election "a themeless pudding" of the sort that Democrats love; if the Democrats can't beat him they are brain dead. Obama won the nomination of the superdelegates only by beating Hillary with the votes of blacks in southern states which should be a gimmie for a Republican candidate in the general election; that puts the Rust Belt in play for the Republicans and if they can't win this election in a walk they are brain dead.
This election is beginning to make me think of Hitler's invasion of the USSR - the only trouble with it is they can't both lose.