To: Gay State Conservative
The zoo’s insurance carrier is heaving a sigh of relief. This will likely be excluded in the civil trial. It's not relevant.
To: SeaHawkFan
This will likely be excluded in the civil trial. It's not relevant.I'm no lawyer (and didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night), but I believe the drug test results could go to lessening the zoo's responsibility, in the determining an award anyway should the zoo lose. Something about aggravating and/or mitigating circumstances?
Maybe some FReeper legal eagle could comment?
23 posted on
06/04/2008 6:56:26 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: SeaHawkFan
This will likely be excluded in the civil trial. It's not relevant.Not relevant? Of course it is.Just as similar facts would be relevant in a car accident.Driver "A" was sober as a judge and driver "B" wasn't...very powerful stuff.
31 posted on
06/04/2008 9:03:17 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson