Posted on 06/03/2008 3:50:05 PM PDT by blam
GGG Ping.
There are humans in New Zealand?
They must have been flying on American.......
New Zealand seems like a nice enough country for all of us U.S. conservatives to move over there very soon in large numbers and then revive conservatism there. New Zealand is still a very socialistic country today.
There is an alternate theory. Those were not rat bite markings at all. Rather the gnawing of a young man while in the process of taking the SAT exam.
I don’t know anything about the Maoris, they might be totally fine people but from their appearance as shown in movies they look like really slimy characters.
Some scientists had thought that humans came to NZ 1,000 years earlier than 1,300 AD ???
Then those scientists are dumb...
First the Moa Hunters came...
Then shortly after or about the same time the Maoris sailed in from Tahiti in their 7 out-rigger canoes...
That was about 900-1,000 AD...
About the same time another group went to Hawaii)
And about the same time the Vikings arrived in America...
Any NZ school kid could have told the scientists that...
The problem in archaeology is when to stop laughing.
LOL! I love it!!!!!
I should cite the source:
Dr Glyn Daniel
Antiquity Dec 1961
I'm pretty sure humans got there long before thought arrived
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. Well, they *do* call it "New" Zealand, after all. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Picture from, Historic Places in New Zealand Magazine, June 1983.
This is said to be a Maori Pa (hill and peninsula fortifications) and within New Zealand there are upwards of 1500-registered Pa sites. The styles of construction are exactly the same as Bronze Age to Iron Age British hill forts. The New Zealand varieties tend to replicate the earliest British styles, where pallisaded barrier fences were erected to keep an enemy at bay. British Archaeologist, Allene Fox, amongst others, commented on the startling similarity between hillfort styles at opposite ends of the globe. The massive undertaking to build so many large fortified positions cannot, realistically, be attributed to the Polynesian Maori, whose advent into New Zealand was in the 13th or 14th centuries AD.
Mrs. Renfield and I went to New Zealand in 2002. Wonderful country. I’d go back again but for the fact that the American dollar has fallen precipitously against the New Zealand dollar in the last few years.
"Martin Doutre's book, "Ancient Celtic New Zealand", suggests strongly that the ancient peoples who inhabited these shores before the Maori arrived, had the knowledge and culture of folk with a kindred "Celtic" civilisation. This extended to stonework and standing stones, the working of stone, artstyles (from which current Maori styles appear to have developed along with other contributions), petroglyphs and possibly even into language."
“As the Pacific rat or kiore cannot swim very far, it can only have arrived in New Zealand with people on board their canoes, either as cargo or stowaways,” Wilmshurst said. “Therefore, the earliest evidence of the Pacific rat in New Zealand must indicate the arrival of people.”
And why is it impossible that people might have arrived without rats?
> There are humans in New Zealand?
There are Americans in California?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.