Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grut

:... the patent system is so expensive that it might as well not exist.”

If the invention is a product, I would advise anyone to spend the money on bringing the product to market with as much force as possible. Competitors are less likely to invest in chasing a product that has already saturated the market. That leaves only knock-offs and next generation competition. A patent, unless you’re Bell Labs, Microsoft, etc. means nothing anymore. International patent protection is even more of a joke!


11 posted on 06/01/2008 6:06:32 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Eurale
If the invention is a product, I would advise anyone to spend the money on bringing the product to market with as much force as possible. Competitors are less likely to invest in chasing a product that has already saturated the market. That leaves only knock-offs and next generation competition. A patent, unless you’re Bell Labs, Microsoft, etc. means nothing anymore. International patent protection is even more of a joke!
If it gets rid of software patents and patent farming I'm all for it. Also if it makes it easier to challenge spurious patents(i.e. One click shopping) that would make me happy too.
14 posted on 06/01/2008 8:50:50 AM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson