To: neverdem
Don’t most historical works render the name of the Civil War general as “McClellan?”
2 posted on
05/31/2008 10:45:29 PM PDT by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: Philo-Junius
"Don’t most historical works render the name of the Civil War general as “McClellan?”
Only because that was his name.
3 posted on
05/31/2008 10:49:29 PM PDT by
joebuck
(Finitum non capax infinitum!)
To: Philo-Junius
Don’t most historical works render the name of the Civil War general as “McClellan?” Yes, but this column is a work of fiction.
4 posted on
05/31/2008 10:51:37 PM PDT by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Philo-Junius
Don’t most historical works render the name of the Civil War general as “McClellan?” That is his correct name. Could this piece be a bit of a preemptive strike to keep the GOP from making the tie-in between the copperheads (RATs) of old and the New Copperheads (RATs) of today. They are the same party with the same goal of destroying the Constitution if not the nation.
10 posted on
06/01/2008 12:01:55 AM PDT by
fella
(Is he or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson