Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Utah Girl

Agreement, Hell!

The TxSC ordered the children’s return. It damned sure didn’t order continued CPS intrusion into their lives.

Make criminal cases against the criminals. Leave innocent children alone.


29 posted on 05/30/2008 3:18:45 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clee1
The TxSC ordered the children’s return.

Sort of. What it really did was concur with the Appeals court, which in turn *ordered* the district court to vacate (rescind) it's order granting CPS custody. This means the parents *have* custody, or will have as soon as the judge complies with the Writ of Mandamus issued by the appeals court. Thus CPS has no authority, whatsoever, to hold any child held under that order. None. If they keep them, it's kidnapping.

That said, CPS could try to get a judge, probably the same judge, to issue a new order, limiting the movement of the children and/or the parents. The Supreme Court said that much, but they can't condition the return of the children on the parents agreeing to that condition absent such a new court order.

IOW, CPS must give the children back ASAP after the judge rescinds her illegal order.

69 posted on 05/30/2008 5:06:02 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson