Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dunkin' Donuts pulls Rachael Ray ad
www.cnnmoney.com ^ | 5-28-08 | AP

Posted on 05/29/2008 11:09:50 AM PDT by JZelle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: JZelle

Why is she wearing a scarf in short sleeves???!!!

It’s JIHAD!!!!!


41 posted on 05/29/2008 11:44:57 AM PDT by kenth (Just think, .000001783% of the population is screwing it all up for the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I also thought Michelle went over the top, but now believe The Toll’s post number 22 nails it.

It could be that Rachael is trying to make a subtle statement but models usually don’t have that much choice of what they wear. I doubt Dunkin’ Donuts is into that, so it’s either coincidence or someone on the PR staff is sneaking in a political statement that went over the heads of those involved.


42 posted on 05/29/2008 11:46:29 AM PDT by Oatka (A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taffini

Agree!


43 posted on 05/29/2008 11:47:25 AM PDT by MEG33 (God Bless Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit

You need not shout, FRiend...

I have nothing against kaffiyehs, or scarves for that matter. Some people wear them because they want to make a political statement, but many people just wear them because they have become a mainstream fashion accessory, like Che Guevara T-shirts.

Since many of the people who wear scarves that look just like that one are doing so to make a political statement, I can understand Dunkin’ Donuts’ decision to pull the ad. They are trying sell coffee, not offend people, after all.

I make no representations as to Rachel Ray’s motivation in wearing that kaffiyeh. For all I know it was handed to her by some prop assistant and she put it on without a second thought.


44 posted on 05/29/2008 11:47:49 AM PDT by gridlock (Now that Polar Bears are protected under ESA, where do I go to apply for a permit to breathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit

“It’s a damn scarf!!!”

Why wear it? Was it cold outside? Why wear one that looks like those worn by our sworn enemies? Why not put her in a Mao jacket and hat?


45 posted on 05/29/2008 11:48:09 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus; All

Y’know, sometimes a scarf is just a....scarf.
Michelle needs to focus on something a wee bit more important.


46 posted on 05/29/2008 11:48:32 AM PDT by 95 Bravo ("Freedom is not free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
In a different vein, in my experience, quite a few women have a visceral, visual hatred for Rachel Ray

That's an interesting observation, I wonder what it is about her that those women are reacting to. As a guy I would recognize something like that as a "catty" reaction, but on what level I wouldn't have a clue.
47 posted on 05/29/2008 11:49:23 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
Hell, she fawningly embraces everybody. She's Ms. Hugs-A-Lot. She trips over herself in praise of every guest she has on the show, smiling her wide smile and giggling and talking a mile a minute.

So she gave Rosie a hug. Big deal. http://tv.spreadit.org/rosie-odonnell-rachael-ray-video/

Despite the fact that you put all of your responses in pretentious little centered frames in order to convey an air of profundity and importance, I don't think you have much to go on there, and I haven't seen any overt political expressions from Ray at all. And ten bucks says that that scarf was probably a set stylist's idea anyway.

48 posted on 05/29/2008 11:49:31 AM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Malkin would be the first to mock Palestinians for insta-rage reactions to innocent gestures. She is a dangerous idiot.

I gotta go with Michelle on this one. I approve very much of RR. But some trendy little stylist draped this thing over her for the shoot because that's what the dhimmi, Democrat fashion industry is showing this year: stylish adaptations of burkhas and other terror-wear. Hard to believe, but it's true.

A few years ago, only a died-in-the-wool campus Marxist or Euro-anti-Semite-Pali-chick would have worn those god-awful black-and-white scarves. They're part of the fashion industry's yearning to cozy up to the enemies of the West—just as they used to push those little Soviet stars a decade or so ago. Michelle just called them on it, and she was right to do it. I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that Dunkin wouldn't have responded if their own focus groups hadn't agreed with Michelle.

Sure, it's true ordinary folks wear those scarves and burkha-heads in Arabia. But the reason the fashionistas picked up on them is because terrorists wear them. The more our people wear terrorist clothing, the more regular folks will think that maybe those scary murderers aren't so alien and bad after all. And why do we have to have an army, anyway?

49 posted on 05/29/2008 11:49:51 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Michelle’s gone absolutely loco. It’s hard to believe Dunkin’ Donuts actually pulled an ad for this nonsense. I’m all for seeing less of Rachel Ray (she’s been unbearable ever since she joined the Church of Oprah), but this is absurd beyond belief.


50 posted on 05/29/2008 11:49:52 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Oh, that’s what it is. I thought they called it hyper-ignorance
________________________________________________________

Oh, I’m sorry; so I guess it’s not a muslime style scarf. OK, Mr. De Laurenta what is it?


51 posted on 05/29/2008 11:52:03 AM PDT by wally-balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

the 30 minute jihadist?


52 posted on 05/29/2008 11:53:14 AM PDT by JackDanielsOldNo7 (On guard until the seal is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: contemplator

I have a friend who has worked with Rachel Ray a few times, and she says that when the camera goes off, the smile disappears and she turns into an absolute ironclad... well, you know...


53 posted on 05/29/2008 11:53:34 AM PDT by gridlock (Now that Polar Bears are protected under ESA, where do I go to apply for a permit to breathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Rachel’s biggest problem is she is perky on overload. But I suppose that is what also helps her get people’s attention.


54 posted on 05/29/2008 11:53:54 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

First the kaffiyeh next the suicide belt. Glad DD nipped this in the bud.

That and the Che t-shirts.


55 posted on 05/29/2008 11:54:38 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park". We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Malkin is way overboard here. The Keffiyeh is a traditional headdress, it has only recently been hijacked by some to imply sympathy with terrorists. Much like gays have hijacked the rainbow symbol to imply gay pride, doesn't mean every kid who draws a rainbow is gay-friendly...just a little naive. I highly doubt Rachel Ray was making any statement here. Over-reactions like this make conservatives seem stale and stupid. We should leave the silly overreactions to the whacko leftists.
56 posted on 05/29/2008 11:55:25 AM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Me thinks Michelle is a bit hyper-sensitive.


57 posted on 05/29/2008 11:56:45 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

It wouldn’t be the first time a pretty, smiling face fooled me. I’m pretty much done for when it comes to beautiful women who can cook. That combination touches on two of my most visceral buttons :)


58 posted on 05/29/2008 11:58:54 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

It covers too much of Rachael?


59 posted on 05/29/2008 12:03:42 PM PDT by Betis70 (All my teams lost and now I am just a hockey fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

I believe that black and white scarves have been around for a LONG time. This is just plain overboard.

If you are looking for some conspiracy, you’re going to eventually find something. Whether it’s an actual conspiracy or not.

The Absolute ad was something, this is nothing.


60 posted on 05/29/2008 12:09:02 PM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson