Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eldoradude

I dont follow - is there a reason why he would not want to disclose a freshly dug find?


16 posted on 05/27/2008 5:56:28 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: spanalot
Here's a condensed version:

Anything dug up after September 24, 1997, that is 10% or more metal and 300 years old or older belongs the government per the Treasure Act 1996. Some of the verbiage:

Where objects are found to be treasure, they belong to the Crown, unless a third party has been granted the right to treasure (called a "franchise") found in a particular area (a list of some such franchises is at pages 244-251 of Hill). Usually the national museums are involved (in England the British Museum, in Wales the National Museum of Wales). They provide expert evidence and guidance to the coroner. To encourage the reporting of finds, the finder is invariably rewarded with a payment representing the value of the find. etc etc etc

Treasure handed down from family you get to keep more of.

17 posted on 05/27/2008 7:23:30 PM PDT by eldoradude (Let's water the tree of liberty with THEIR blood...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson