Replies

This was no mere "slip of the tongue" or attempt to "jog memories".

I heard the whole clip. The statement was not particularly alarming when heard in context of a response. No long pauses of disbelief from the reporter. I know Clinton can be calculating, but if she's so clever why make such a stupid statement? The Dems are simply feigning indignation to get her out of the race. Read my earlier blather and you'll see I didn't say "slip of the tongue". It was exactly what she was thinking. Just a poorly used reference in time, nothing more.

It just shows that she’s creepy; RFK was the only person to take the fight to June. And even if he did, what did his assasination have to do with his contesting the CA primary?

I'll not argue with your points; save to assert that a President cannot afford such luxuries as reflexive "gal pals having lunch" assertions or "poorly used reference[s] in time".

I still have original newspaper clippings from the time of RFK's assassination. I do not, will not ever see the sense of his being assassinated reduced to a "campaign season in June in CA".

I think about the Presidential Candidates we've had in the past, and when I stack up Hillary and Obama next to them; I'm horrified.

If either of these gets elected, God Help and Defend our Military.

Hillary: "Yes, well this issue of sexual preferences really puts me in mind of Abu Ghraib and the Panty Scene - you see some people are just naturally, by nature, drawn to...