Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sue Perkick
“Mainstreaming works great for some but not all. The problem is that often the parents of the special needs child aren’t always given a voice. Even if they believe their child would function better in a special education school they often get overruled. If they would do this on a case by case basis evaluating the needs & abilities of each child, mainstreaming would work much better. But we also have unqualified teachers anxious to get these kids for the extra somethin’ somethin’ in their paychecks. Then it becomes a disaster for everyone.”

No, I'm afraid that THE problem is that too many people still don't know what to do when a child doesn't respond to the normal ways of getting them to behave. Some kids respond well to getting smacked. Others do not. Some will do nearly anything for a hug, or a piece of candy or gum. By law, every child with a confirmed disability must have an IEP. That is “INDIVIDUALIZED education program.” The parents do have input, but sometimes it's hard to go against what the district wants to do. I've been on both sides of the table during IEP meetings, and it helps to have some prepared options. We used to go with up to four pages of things we'd like to try for our son, who has Asperger’s Syndrome. We knew we couldn't get all of it, or even much of it, but it smoothed things out considerably to have them be able to pick and choose a few of them, to try.

Here is a website that advises parents, teachers, and administrators on Special Education law. http://www.wrightslaw.com/
It tends to the adversarial, but gives good advice to all.

Part of the problem is that the law requires kids to receive a “free, appropriate, public education” or FAPE, in the LRE, or “least restrictive environment.” For some kids, that LRE is the regular classroom, and for others, a self-contained, and very restrictive environment like a hospital. The law requires, also, that you try less-restrictive environments, first. Regular class, then maybe regular class with aide, or pull-out for lab, etc., before you put someone in a class with two desks and a teacher. Least restrictive is also least costly. If they aren't doing this on an individual basis, trying to do what is best for the kid, they are breaking the law, and wasting time and $$$.

BTW, most places don't have “special education schools” for other than deaf or blind students, anymore. They have classrooms in regular schools.

139 posted on 05/25/2008 9:18:28 AM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Old Student
BTW, most places don't have “special education schools” for other than deaf or blind students, anymore. They have classrooms in regular schools.

I can only speak of the area where I live. And we do have them.

143 posted on 05/25/2008 9:25:56 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I've done here today doesn't force you to have a negative opinion of me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: Old Student; Sue Perkick
BTW, most places don't have “special education schools” for other than deaf or blind students, anymore. They have classrooms in regular schools.

We don't have them in my district, either, although some districts in the state might.

146 posted on 05/25/2008 9:46:48 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson