Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enough_idiocy

“I don’t want to defend a clinton, but she’s being railroaded here. Her comment was taken way way out of context. What she said was historically accurate.”

What bloody context? Just hearing about this and I’m ready to buy and a gun and start shooting. I can’t believe people are defending Shrillary over this!

This is the context: She is calling on her peops, help me out. Blow this mofo’s brains out so I can win.

What other context do you think she is suggesting. That is EXACTLY what she is thinking. Someone can turn out his lights and she wins by DEFAULT.

Because she wants the POWER.

And apparently this was no mere slip. I’ve heard it reported that she has said this in MARCH.

Okay, don’t take this personal as I don’t mean to attack you here but please tell me what context all these defenders of Shrillary are trying to explain.
I am not an Obama supporter but I am an American. And this b()**%^ needs to be taken to the back of the shed and put of her misery.

For the good of the nation. I’m disgusted by her remarks but have to say in a way glad that America can see her for who she is.


26 posted on 05/24/2008 6:18:57 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: romanesq

I guess you didn’t bother to watch the video,huh? Ignorance is bliss, huh?


30 posted on 05/24/2008 6:23:13 AM PDT by NYC Republican (John McCain- Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: romanesq

Post 27 maninly applies to you. Just because we hate Hillary, doesn’t mean she’s always wrong. Do yourself a favor, watch the video... for yourself, NOT through the MSM lens, and let us know if she’s being railroaded or not. 2 minutes of you time... You may realize you were snookered by the MSM...


33 posted on 05/24/2008 6:25:17 AM PDT by NYC Republican (John McCain- Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: romanesq

Good grief! She was discussing the history of primaries. What is next? If she mentions Nixon, is she suggesting someone impeach Obama? If she mentions Lincoln, is she suggesting someone should kill him in a theater?

Obama may force me to vote for that despicable weasel McCain. It is frightening to contemplate someone with such a messianic complex in the WH...although...McCain isn’t much better on that account either!


67 posted on 05/24/2008 6:55:06 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (No matter who wins the Presidency, it will be an enemy of the Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: romanesq

“What bloody context? Just hearing about this and I’m ready to buy and a gun and start shooting.”

Ok, that’s beyond ridiculous.

“I can’t believe people are defending Shrillary over this!” Maybe if you read what she said or saw the video you’d understand.

“This is the context: She is calling on her peops, help me out. Blow this mofo’s brains out so I can win.” BS. Utter BS. If you read the entire statement that is not what she was doing. This is ridiculous. Notice it’s the liberal media who reading the most ridiculous things into statements (Bush’s remarks in Israel come to mind?), and now people here are sheeping along to it.

“What other context do you think she is suggesting. That is EXACTLY what she is thinking. Someone can turn out his lights and she wins by DEFAULT.” First of all, you nor anyone else knows exactly what she’s thinking. Only she does.

“My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right?” “We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.”

She made this point to when asked why she was staying in until June. Her answer is because, as history has shown us, it’s not over until it’s over. Ted Kennedy took it to the convention to, why shouldn’t she. She has a colorable argument to stay in and she was using past precedent to show she’s not some looney trying to take the party down as the MSM is making her out to be so their messaih can start running against McCain. Look, the MSM is in bed with the DNC and they both realize Obama needs to be fighting on one front only. They’re pushing her out and doing so, in part, by claiming she’s some renegade who’s out to take the party down. That’s BS. She’s got a good argument for not quiting.

“Because she wants the POWER.” Like every other politician. Give me a break.

“And apparently this was no mere slip. I’ve heard it reported that she has said this in MARCH.” Provide the link. I also recall she made a reference to assination in the past, but I believe it was an entirely different context than this.

“Okay, don’t take this personal as I don’t mean to attack you here but please tell me what context all these defenders of Shrillary are trying to explain.” I wish I would’ve read this sooner.

“I am not an Obama supporter but I am an American. And this b()**%^ needs to be taken to the back of the shed and put of her misery.” That’s extreme.

“For the good of the nation. I’m disgusted by her remarks but have to say in a way glad that America can see her for who she is.” I don’t read her remarks that way, but I agree with the last part, I’m glad America has finally woken up to the real Clintons.


83 posted on 05/24/2008 7:09:14 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: romanesq

This is what was said:

“that’s been the pattern for some time now . . . it’s the tougest job . . . you should be willing to campaign for every vote, you shoudl eb willing to debate anytime anywhere . . . people have been trying to push me out ever since Iowa . . . I find it curious because it is unprecedent in history . . . there has been this urgency to end this . . . historically that makes no sense. Q: you don’t buy the party unity argument? I don’t because again I’ve been around long enough and my husband did not wrap up . . . “

It’s not debattable. So what, she made the same point in the past, so what? Are Freepers seriously playing by the Obama rules now? She can’t bring up Kennedy’s assiniation -it’s off the table like Michelle Obama. Nope, can’t bring up historical fact that serves as a second and third example of how the decision isn’t always wrapped up by June. Nope can’t do it b/c Obama is black and the bad bad racists in America who didn’t vote for him may hear this and shoot him for Hillary.

Sorry folks, but people siding with the MSM on this are in the lefty camp. This is ridiculous. This is textbook liberal spin.


99 posted on 05/24/2008 7:30:24 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: romanesq

I agree with your post. Hillary was blowing a silent dog whistle to one of her crazy fans to take him out. She just didn’t think that the media would make a big fuss over it.

I love the fact that Sharpton is sharply rebuking her for it. I love to see liberals fight each other.

If McCain had of said that, they would be demanding that he step down. They should demand that of Clinton.


156 posted on 05/26/2008 8:43:01 AM PDT by ClarenceThomasfan (Rush wouldn't lift a finger to help Fred or Duncan, yet he shills for Hillary. Rush is a fat idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson