That’s like blaming Batista for Castro, or blaming Chiang Kai-Shek for the rise of Mao. No, the communists and their useful idiots who preferred Maoist tyranny to monarchy are the ones who are to blame. It is the actions of the pro-communist Indian government which have been disgraceful, as well as treacherous. Those Indians who helped the maoists take over Nepal by opposing and isolating the king have helped the very same communist terrorists who are waging war on their own country, India. They are traitors to India, and have ensured that Nepal will now establish further links with Communist China at India’s expense.
“That’s like blaming Batista for Castro, or blaming Chiang Kai-Shek for the rise of Mao.”
Perhaps I am. I could add Tsar Nicholas II to that list as well. The trouble is, if it wasn’t for the fact these tyranical, corrupt a**hats were not misruling their country in the first place, people wouldn’t be turning to extreme solutions to get rid of them. So yes, they do have to share the blame for creating conditions that make it easier for communists to come to power. Communists don’t manage to seize power unless the regime they have replaced is a cruel and arbitrary tyranny. The Maoists didn’t stand a chance of gaining power till the King decided to try and make himself an absolute monarch....
Talk about cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face. Do you think that the Indian government was either leftist, ignorant, naive or just stupid?