Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adoption of FLDS name is akin to identity theft
Deseret News ^ | Sunday, May 11, 2008 | Joseph A. Cannon

Posted on 05/11/2008 6:58:25 AM PDT by MrEdd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: MrEdd

I’m not too worried about misconceptions and Mormons but I am very concerned that so many children can be stripped from their parents over one allegation of abuse. I know of children in horrible families who others trying to help spend years trying to remove them from abusive parents who not only are violent but also involved in the sell of illegal drugs. One child in particular finally was removed only after being institutionalized by his bad mother. Finally his father was able to get custody when they finally got the mother to go ballistic in court and drop her facade of “how her son was her life and how much she loved him”. All the beatings, the being burnt with cigarettes, the being left alone with a step dad who abused them. No one listened to the children or the concerned family members. The Mom even had free legal support and she sadly still has custody of two of the children.

That is what gets me. What level of abuse was different in the case of the FLDS? I don’t support their lifestyle, I don’t agree with their theology but there are far worse examples that no one gives a damn about. It seems that if anything the courts go out of their way to keep certain kids where the abuse is more than apparent in the hands of their abusive parents. That aside there seems to be real problems with the justification for taking those kids and now they are having a very difficult time finding the alleged abuse.
Sure there are 14-17 year old girls pregnant but I don’t see the federal government raiding housing projects taking hundreds of kids into custody. It just seems phony and it sets bad precedence. One unconfirmed phone call would not get this kind of attention if the group had been almost any other group.


21 posted on 05/11/2008 7:40:14 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Never confuse polite defferment for submission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; Greg F; ...
Boy am I confused, you're posting on two threads. ;)

FIP Ping to post 12.

22 posted on 05/11/2008 7:41:28 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Plea to mormon FReepers, "DONT HOSE ME, BRO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
It’s easy to tell them apart. With one it’s Brigham Young. With the other it’s “bring ‘em young!”

Hilarious! (But it should have had a warning attached about reading if you have a mouthful of morning coffee...!)

23 posted on 05/11/2008 7:51:16 AM PDT by MizSterious (God bless the Texas Rangers for freeing women & children from sexual slavery and abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
I agree with you 100%. From all I have read (and the past few weeks, I've read a lot), LDS (and the 'f' brand of it***) is more like a completely separate religion like the Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus--although LDS is not nearly as ancient. Many non-Christian religions will often mention Jesus Christ, and so do the Mormons, but it is not in the same context as we are taught in church, or even in the Holy Bible.

(***I am often browbeaten verbally pummeled threatened told in no uncertain terms by SOME PEOPLE that it is politically incorrect to write the name of this group if the "f" is not capitalized. So perhaps I'll just write it as "F***", or perhaps the F-religion.)

24 posted on 05/11/2008 8:02:50 AM PDT by MizSterious (God bless the Texas Rangers for freeing women & children from sexual slavery and abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Sorry, I didn’t realize there were two threads running the same article and posted on the wrong thread initially.

It is the same guy.


25 posted on 05/11/2008 8:03:14 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
"What level of abuse was different in the case of the FLDS?"

I suspect that part of it was the sheer magnitude--so many children at risk in this case. The other part, I'm sure, is the very real prospect of girls reaching puberty (which as you know can happen as early as 10) being "eligible" for becoming a celestial bride for some old guy that already has a harem bunch of wives.

ONE of the things the papers don't often address is even more dangerous, and that is their practice of "breaking the babies" of crying, resistance, etc., by holding them under running water or slapping them endlessly until the wee one just gives up. There are a LOT of baby graves outside of Colorado City and other enclaves, and I will forever wonder, not to mention worry, that some of those innocent babes who were treated that way didn't live through the "breaking."

No, the more I read about this group, the more I wish the Texas Rangers had acted sooner.

26 posted on 05/11/2008 8:10:42 AM PDT by MizSterious (God bless the Texas Rangers for freeing women & children from sexual slavery and abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
FLDS practices polygamy; men of the FLDS priesthood "spirit" marry multiple women but mostly young girls who are easier to bamboozle.

LDS forsook polygamy for statehood; men of the LDS priesthood "spirit" marry one earthly wife but unlimited previously alive but now deceased women.

The FLDS appears more rational than the LDS, in an odd sort of way. While it is illegal to "spirit" marry a minor, at least the minor girl is alive. And while it is illegal to consummate such a "union"; there is no law preventing an LDS man from "spirit" marrying your dead grandma!

27 posted on 05/11/2008 8:11:02 AM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Bingo!


28 posted on 05/11/2008 8:18:50 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

So, I suppose we should expect headlines next week stating that the LDS is suing the FLDS for identity theft?


29 posted on 05/11/2008 8:39:05 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I think you’ve summarized it pretty well.


30 posted on 05/11/2008 8:44:41 AM PDT by festus (Tagline removed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I had no idea the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, or LDS, had anything to do with the FLDS.

Dang! How could I have missed the connection? It was so there.

I had assumed, based on various reports in the media, that it stood for the Church of Fornication with Little Daughters and Sisters.

How could I have been so wrong?

Now, if I just could figure out what the F stood for, I’d have all four letters and could solve the puzzle.


31 posted on 05/11/2008 8:54:14 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
So, I suppose we should expect headlines next week stating that the LDS is suing the FLDS for identity theft?

That reminds me of the commercial with guys from Diet Coke wanting to sue Coke.
32 posted on 05/11/2008 9:11:49 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie (<----- Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Maybe the FLDS should SUE the LDS??


33 posted on 05/11/2008 9:13:37 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

“After a few minutes, it became clear that he thought I was somehow affiliated with the FLDS group. I felt like an anthropology specimen. The questions were friendly and good natured, but imbedded in them was the notion that there was really no difference between the LDS Church and the FLDS group, they were simply all Mormons to him.”

Well, when you put an orange, a tangerine, and a navel orange and their variations in a pile, confusion is obvious.

Here are some 100% facts that the LDS cannot deny:

1) FLDS polygamy comes straight from the words of Joseph Smith, enhanced by Brigham Young.
2) The FLDS can site an unbroken chain back to Smith and the early Mormon church that is as compelling as the LDS.
3) the FLDS uses the BOM and I believe the other main works. It isn’t like we are comparing Hinduism and Christianity.

The problem for the LDS is that they are indeed peas in a pod with the FLDS and while this FACT may cause them embarrassment, it cannot be wished away.


34 posted on 05/11/2008 9:17:44 AM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

“Maybe the FLDS should SUE the LDS??”

If they were here First.

Oh, I get it. The F stands for First. Puzzle solved.


35 posted on 05/11/2008 9:24:45 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I like the comment about Mormons claiming to be Christians as an affront to Christianity. If the LDS doesn’t care for the FLDS claiming to be Mormon, maybe the LDS should stop trying to proclaim itself Christian. LDS was started by a child raping murderer who created a “religion” to entice people into giving him his way, nothing more. It wasn’t a religion, it was a cult.


36 posted on 05/11/2008 9:28:34 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“but I am very concerned that so many children can be stripped from their parents over one allegation of abuse.”

Then you’ll be happy to know that isn’t what happened.


37 posted on 05/11/2008 9:30:59 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

SO....

In the FLDS , the priesthood marry the women and girls of Warren Jeffs choosing.

In the LDS, the priesthood marry the women and girls that are dead.

Either way, the females don’t get a choice.


38 posted on 05/11/2008 9:36:03 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

I just want to know if they are going to sue the RLDS as well.


39 posted on 05/11/2008 9:40:49 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; Maelstorm

“but I am very concerned that so many children can be stripped from their parents over one allegation of abuse.”


But, I am very concerned that so many children can be stripped from their parents, from multiple states, and even Canada, by one man, and taken to Texas, to live like slaves on a large plantation, and there only be one charge of abuse.


40 posted on 05/11/2008 9:47:47 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson