Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jaguarmike
I'm not sure what value a voter fraud effort in Gary would have. Since these Democratic primaries are not carried out under the same winner-take-all process as the GOP primaries, there is hardly any difference between a narrow Clinton win and a narrow Obama win in Indiana.

Heck -- just look at what happened in Texas. Clinton "won" the Texas primary but Obama ended up with more delegates.

56 posted on 05/06/2008 8:27:09 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Not true - if BO wins in Indiana, it’s proof he can win a state without a caucus and/or a huge black population. It’d be a symbolic victory that would sew the little Marxist thug up the Democrat nomination.

Voter fraud is too high a price to pay to get rid of Hillary - he’s actually worse.


63 posted on 05/06/2008 8:31:47 PM PDT by Baladas (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

I don’t know if you watched her speech or not tonight. She conceded from my understanding of words.


64 posted on 05/06/2008 8:33:29 PM PDT by eyedigress (If you aren't voting who cares about your opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson