To: Jaguarmike
I'm not sure what value a voter fraud effort in Gary would have. Since these Democratic primaries are not carried out under the same winner-take-all process as the GOP primaries, there is hardly any difference between a narrow Clinton win and a narrow Obama win in Indiana.
Heck -- just look at what happened in Texas. Clinton "won" the Texas primary but Obama ended up with more delegates.
56 posted on
05/06/2008 8:27:09 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: Alberta's Child
Not true - if BO wins in Indiana, it’s proof he can win a state without a caucus and/or a huge black population. It’d be a symbolic victory that would sew the little Marxist thug up the Democrat nomination.
Voter fraud is too high a price to pay to get rid of Hillary - he’s actually worse.
63 posted on
05/06/2008 8:31:47 PM PDT by
Baladas
(M)
To: Alberta's Child
I don’t know if you watched her speech or not tonight. She conceded from my understanding of words.
64 posted on
05/06/2008 8:33:29 PM PDT by
eyedigress
(If you aren't voting who cares about your opinion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson