[contemplator]

Those “siezed records” are what is commonly known as “evidence”. I love how the article skillfully neglects to mention why the defense attorney objected to using the documents and just mentions that the judge denied the objection.

[kbennkc]

Papers found in the custody of who knows who , filled out sometime by somebody , between March and August 2007 , offered to reflect events that may have taken place at different times , and offered against who knows who . How could that be a problem ? Sounds good enough to me .

[Bushwacker777]

Michael Savage on the Texas Stormtroopers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u4vXU0aYeU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBOHpf3SEc8&feature=related

[longtermmemmory]

nor does the article mention this is the child custody case not the criminal case.

Nor does the article mention the function of the admission into evidence. It seems the admission was to line up parentage rather than criminality.

Also why is the state releasing evidence to be used in a PENDING criminal investigation? That only buys a change of venue motion.