Posted on 05/04/2008 7:11:09 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
climton has 1500 delagates obama has 1700. clinton is clearly the winner. You heard it here first.
Dougfromupland has brought out her FELONIES. SHE HAS TO APPEAR IN COURT. She has committed more crimes than any of us. I am sick of “slick” or “teflon” being attached to these two criminals. They should be “convicted”. I know that I sound like a du but there were real violations of the law. Many were dead serious. W walked away and never said bupkis. W must have something really interesting in his FBI file with a certain mexican nanny.
Celebrate.
He probably got together with his mentor Wright and drank a toast to Osama Bin Laden.
I wish Bush would be that clear.”
________________________________
Bush and Rice are doing all they can to push Israel into the sea. With “friends” like these.....
I wish Bush would be that clear.
His failure to do so has pissed me off for 5 years. He HAS THE BULLY PULPIT. When will he stand up as a man and ....oh crap...he is a globalist...open borders..mexamericanada...texas will have a mexican highway running through to canada..mexican embassies are in individual states ..Do we have that in guatamala? I have met them.
Among today's leftist Democrats, that's true.
But as I recall, the only American President to authorize a nuclear attack on another country was Democrat Harry Truman.
And during the Cuban Missile Crisis, arguably the closest we've come to dealing with a live nuclear situation, it was Democrat JFK in the Oval Office who faced down the USSR.
None of today's Democrats would be fit to polish the shoes of either of those old-time Dems, of course. By today's Dem reckoning, those old guys would be classed as conservatives.
-ccm
Could it be that with Barry Hussein, Jimmy Carter has finally met his match in the foreign relations arena?
“faced down the USSR”
Actually he negotiated. He agreed to remove US missiles from Turkey, which was the equivalet of Russian missiles in Cuba. That would be a tit for tat candy assed response. In addition, because he is a great negotiator, he threw in a promise that the US would never attack Cuba. That invited wars all over the southern hemisphere (Angola, Nicaragua, etc...) As Cuban troops poped up in every Socialist hellhole in South America and Africa.
For all his faults, Bush would have made those sites dissapear after fortifying Guantanamo.
Just a question....The Tehran Hostage crisis and China forcing our Orion NSA plane to the ground and stealing our technology and capabilities. Do you think that would have happened with Bush at the helm? Strenth and the projection of that strenth has many advantages.
Actually Hillary was misquoted. She meant to say she would “obliterate Irene”.
Hillary and Irene are rivals to win the romantic affections of Hillary's aide Huma.
> Actually he negotiated...
Point taken.
> ...For all his faults, Bush would have made those sites dissapear after fortifying Guantanamo.
Maybe. I have become frustrated trying to predict what GWB will do in a given situation. You could be right.
> Just a question....The Tehran Hostage crisis and China forcing our Orion NSA plane to the ground and stealing our technology and capabilities. Do you think that would have happened with Bush at the helm?
Again, hard to say. He has shown strength in some ways, but has been disappointing in others. I don't care to argue about it; I won't disagree that he would have handled those things differently.
> Strenth and the projection of that strenth has many advantages.
Unquestionably true.
Obama criticizes Clinton over her words about Iran
AP (via My Way) | May 4, 2008 | LIZ SIDOTI
Posted on 05/04/2008 9:50:07 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2011078/posts
-however-
O’Reilly-Clinton Interview Shows Dem Flaw [Good analysis]
Townhall | May 2, 2008 | Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
Posted on 05/04/2008 4:35:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2011217/posts
[snip] Obama and Hillary both want to pull out as soon as technically feasible. OK. But what happens if Iran moves into the vacuum and takes over Iraq? And what if Al Qaeda takes advantage of the American absence and sets up a permanent base and sanctuary in Iraq, beyond our reach — a situation akin to the Taliban in Afghanistan where they could develop the capacity to hit us on 9-11 in their privileged, protected home territory? [end]
-background-
Sunday Times Hints: Israel’s Evidence on Iran Justifies Strike
Arutz 7 | 5-4-08 | Hillel Fendel
Posted on 05/04/2008 9:46:47 AM PDT by Nachum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2011077/posts
MI6 Chief Visits Mossad for Talks on Iran’s Nuclear Threat
TimesOnline - UK | May 04, 2008
Posted on 05/04/2008 7:25:48 AM PDT by nuconvert
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2011027/posts
EFP Cache Found in Warij
Multi-National Force - Iraq
Posted on 05/04/2008 1:27:41 PM PDT by SandRat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2011147/posts
Iran Demands Halt to US attacks in Iraq
AFP | May 2, 2008 | Staff
Posted on 05/03/2008 3:15:09 PM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2010832/posts
LOL!
My Lord, I never thought I would agree with anything she said...
Nah, you don’t mean us honkies, do you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.