Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strategic Collapse in the War on Terror
www.americanthinker.com ^ | May 4, 2008 | Joseph Meyers

Posted on 05/03/2008 11:29:22 PM PDT by givemELL

Words matter, and in the global war on terror we are losing the battle of words, in a self-inflicted defeat. The consequences could not be more profound.

Recent government policy memoranda, circulating through the national counter-terrorism and diplomatic community, establishes a new "speech code" for the lexicon in the war on terror, as reported by the Associated Press and now available in the public domain .

These new "speech codes" recommended that analysts and policy makers avoid the terms jihad or jihadist or mujhadid or "al-Qaida movement" and replace them with "extremists" and by extension other non-specific terms.

The use of these "new words" and rejection of the "old words" is ostensibly designed to avoid legitimating al-Qaida and its followers while mollifying the sensitivities of the larger Muslim community.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: collapse; globaljihad; jihad; pc; politicalcorrectness; politicallycorrect; strategic; terror; war
Extremely well developed case on the disastrous adoption of new US policy to not call modern Islamic Jihad what it is, even in its own religiously mandated terms for the last 1400 years. Western Civilizational self-immolation is preposterous in concept, yet, here we have it. Meyers piece is a wonderfully inclusive and conclusive case in response to the US State Depts directive, which is only a few days old.
1 posted on 05/03/2008 11:29:23 PM PDT by givemELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: givemELL

In times of war, the State Department needs to be sent on vacation for the duration.


2 posted on 05/03/2008 11:38:26 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("There is no civility, only politics.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Maybe vacation in sunny Gaza?


3 posted on 05/03/2008 11:40:27 PM PDT by givemELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

Extremists, myass.


4 posted on 05/03/2008 11:55:09 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
ON THE INTERNET:

Link

Link

WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "D.C. ANTI-GANG EFFORT: CALL THEM CREWS INSTEAD" by David C. Lipscomb (April 30, 2008)


HOT AIR.com - blog (VIDEO) - New Jihad Watch: "WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE" [Robert Spencer, JIHADWATCH.org] (May 1, 2008)

COUNTERTERRORISM BLOG.org: "THE CONTINUING DEBATE OVER 'JIHADISTS' AS THE ENEMY" by Jeffrey Imm (April 30, 2008)

AMERICAN THINKER.com: "FLYING BLIND IN THE WAR ON TERROR" by Patrick Poole (April 30, 2008)

HUMAN EVENTS.com: "NO JIHADIS HERE!" by Robert Spencer (April 29, 2008)

INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT.org: "DANGEROUS WORD GAMES" by Steven Emerson (April 25, 2008)

COUNTERTERRORISM BLOG.org: "WHO IS AMERICA FIGHTING -- JIHADISTS OR EXTREMISTS?" by Jeffrey Imm (April 24, 2008)

JIHAD WATCH.org (AP): "'JIHADIST' BOOTED FROM GOVERNMENT LEXICON" (April 24, 2008)

JIHAD WATCH.org: "NEW STATE DEPARTMENT LEXICON FORBIDS USE OF THE WORDS 'JIHAD' OR JIHADIST'" (April 22, 2008)

Link

Link

5 posted on 05/03/2008 11:57:12 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
ADDING 1 link to post no. 5:


6 posted on 05/04/2008 12:01:07 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Invisible ink? Let me try this again.

INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT.org - IPT News: "INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT RELEASES GOV'T MEMOS CURTAILING SPEECH IN WAR ON TERROR" by Steven Emerson (May 2, 2008)

7 posted on 05/04/2008 12:02:32 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: XR7

The US State departments’ (I will bring it up once more) recent announcement of eschewing officially the terms ‘jihad, jihadist, muhahadeen, islamofascist, etc., is a pseudo-effective policy, in fact, it is an extremely destructive policy. Our policymakers, they forget Neville Chamberlain and Hitler. The immediate compliance within hours of the new directive by the House panel on Darfur on C Span 2 last week was pathetic...all parties on the panel, including those giving testimonials, avoided these terms to a man (Negroponte, Mendez, Boxer, the US rep to Darfur)...the term substituted for all these terms was..’BAD ACTORS’...pathetic. ‘Extremists’ was too severe a term for the Dem panelists, and, the persons giving testimony. ‘Bad Actors’ has been adopted as the first attempt at using new terminology, AND IT IS A FATALLY WEAK, STUPID SUBSTITUTE. The Sec. of State, is now playing a ‘piano piece’ of policy called ‘The Death March of the West’. The fact that ‘Bad Actors’ is the first recognizable compliant effort of govt. officials should be widely disseminated. It will not be. Only some Freepers will notice it.


8 posted on 05/04/2008 12:04:55 AM PDT by givemELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

The State Dept. is still full of Commies and pro-Arab/pro-Palestinian Socialists who could give a rat’s behind about American citizens. They “serve” our enemies, not us. I believe the State Dept. should be banished to the UAE or to Lebanon where it can represent those it coddles and adores.


9 posted on 05/04/2008 1:16:53 AM PDT by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

I hate to say or see it but in order to shake some of our all loving liberal friends loose is to have one or two more 9/11’s. As I can see it, this is about the only thing what might turn this country in to the right direction. Let’s face it, if it walks like a duck and quakes like a duck chances are better then good it is one and the same holds true for a terrorist or what ever other name he goes by.


10 posted on 05/04/2008 1:32:03 AM PDT by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: givemELL
Shades of Viet Nam.
11 posted on 05/04/2008 3:23:57 AM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: levotb

Wow, we have like only 90% that meet your criteria:) I agree something needs to be done to keep the careerists from opposing presidential policy....


12 posted on 05/04/2008 3:56:53 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

I agree something needs to be done to keep the careerists from opposing presidential policy....

Like CUT Federal Government! It's money, it's authority, it's programs, it's overarching regulations, it's corporate taxes, it's careerist politicians. Take the money out of the (arrogant) Senators' hands. That is EXACTLY what tax cuts are primarily about (much less about "consumer/economic" mathematical models).

13 posted on 05/04/2008 4:46:47 AM PDT by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

bump


14 posted on 05/04/2008 6:05:37 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

Just good old pandering to the lesser Jihadis in order to get them behind the destruction of Iran.


15 posted on 05/04/2008 6:12:32 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Hussein Obama for Caliph 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
Shades of Viet Nam.

Yes, yes.
I remember: the MSM and elite snobs in academia would say, "Actually, Ho Chi Minh is really a nationalist."

16 posted on 05/04/2008 10:15:58 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson